According to Thayer, the skunk, which for years has been an important item of the stock-in-trade of the advocates of the theory of warning colouration, is an excellent example of obliterative colouring, since its enemies are supposed to mistake for the sky-line the line of junction between the white fur of the back and the dark fur of the sides. Similarly the crocodiles are supposed to mistake a flamingo for the sky at sunrise or at sunset!
There is doubtless something in this theory of obliterative colouration.
Any one can see, by paying a visit to the South Kensington Museum, that an animal which is of a lighter colour below than above, is less conspicuous in a poor light than it would be were it uniformly coloured. There is then no doubt that this scheme of colour, which is so common in nature, has some protective value.
To this extent has Mr Thayer made a valuable contribution to zoological science. But when he informs us that obliterative colouring is a “universal attribute of animal life,” we feel sorely tempted to poke fun at him.
We would ask all those who believe in the universality of obliterative colouring to observe a flock of rooks wending their way to their dormitories at sunset.
Let us now pass on to the examination of the more orthodox theories of animal colouration.
Objections to the Theory of Cryptic Colouring
Before criticising the theory of cryptic colouring, we desire to state distinctly that we admit that, where other things are equal, it is of advantage to all creatures which hunt or which are preyed upon to be inconspicuous. If difficult to distinguish amid their natural surroundings, the former are likely to secure their prey readily, and the latter have a chance of escaping from their enemies. Our quarrel is with the theory of cryptic colouring as it is enunciated by many Neo-Darwinians, with the theory that every hue, every marking, every device displayed by an organism is of utility to the organism and has been directly developed by natural selection.
The extreme advocates of the theory of cryptic colouring have greatly exaggerated the degree in which animals are assimilated to their natural environment.