John Pickard, Prin. of Portsmouth High School, N.H.: I like it exceedingly. It is clear, straightforward, practical, and not too heavy.
Ezra Brainerd, Pres. and Prof. of Physics, Middlebury College, Vt.: I have looked it over carefully, and regard it as a much better book for high schools than the former work. (Feb. 6, 1888.)
James A. De Boer, Prin. of High School, Montpelier, Vt.: I have not only examined, but studied it, and consider it superior as a text-book to any other I have seen. (Feb. 10, ’88.)
E. B. Rosa, Teacher of Physics, English and Classical School, Providence, R.I.: I think it the best thing in that grade published, and intend to use it another year. (Feb. 23, ’88.)
G. H. Patterson, Prin. and Prof. of Physics, Berkeley Sch., Providence, R.I.: A very practical book by a practical teacher. (Feb. 2, 1888.)
George E. Beers, Prin. of Evening High School, Bridgeport, Conn.: The more I see of Professor Gage’s books, the better I like them. They are popular, and at the same time scientific, plain and simple, full and complete. (Feb. 18, 1888.)
Arthur B. Chaffee, Prof. in Franklin College, Ind.: I am very much pleased with the new book. It will suit the average class better than the old edition.
W. D. Kerlin, Supt. of Public Schools, New Castle, Ind.: I find that it is the best adapted to the work which we wish to do in our high school of any book brought to my notice.
C. A. Bryant, Supt. of Schools, Paris, Tex.: It is just the book for high schools. I shall use it next year.