[83] The following is the Reviewer's mode of stating this:—"Had the Commander-in-Chief suffered these works to be assaulted as was eagerly proposed to him on the same evening, there is no question but they must have fallen with scarcely an effort before a single brigade."—p. 445.
[84] Vide the whole of this Correspondence in the Appendix, No. XXX.
[85] This statement and those of the General and other officers, subsequently referred to, all of which are under the hand, and many of them attested by the oaths of the parties, contain the facts relative to the expedition against Plattsburg, to which those officers would have been ready to depose before a Court-Martial.
[86] Review, p. 446.
[87] Review, p. 446.
[88] In the celebrated action between our fleet, commanded by Lord Howe, and that of the French, on the 1st of June, 1794, whilst they were in sight of each other, and preparing for action, the order was given for our men to go to breakfast. See Brenton's Naval History, vol. i. p. 272-307.
[89] Review, p. 448.
[90] Notwithstanding the opinion entertained by Sir George Prevost and the army regarding the probable fall of Plattsburg, it must be recollected that failure was possible, and that nearly at this very period we had been disappointed in our attempts both upon Baltimore and New Orleans. The opinion of the Americans themselves upon this subject, will be found well expressed in an extract from a Burlington paper (State of Vermont) of that period, given in the Appendix, No. XXXI.
[91] Review, p. 447.
[92] Review, p. 448.