[1257] W. v. H. 320.
[1258] Ibid. 321.
[1259] A later statement by Shank in the Sharers Papers puts it at £1,400. Heminges describes Witter’s ‘parte’ by a slip as one-sixth instead of one-seventh of the moiety. If the £120 was one-twelfth of the total cost, his figure (£1,440) would agree with that of Shank. Professor Wallace says in The Times of 2 Oct. 1909, ‘This amount is in fact excessive.... I have other contemporary documents showing the cost was far less than £1,400.’
[1260] W. v. H. 323; Wallace in The Times (1914).
[1261] O. v. H. ll. 245 sqq.
[1262] Lambert, Shakespeare Documents, 87.
[1263] W. v. H. 323.
[1264] Halliwell-Phillipps, i. 312.
[1265] Cf. ch. xi. There was a much rougher type of audience at the Globe; cf. Shirley, Prologue at the Globe, to his Comedy called ‘The Doubtful Heir’, which should have been presented at the Blackfriars, quoted in Variorum, iii. 69.
[1266] Cf. ch. xvii (Blackfriars).