y = ·0891 x ·86.
Where y is the depth of water absorbed in feet and x is the time in hours. The observations extended over eight days. Denoting by c the depth of water in feet absorbed in one hour, it was found that on a field on which no rain had fallen for two months, c was ·04 to ·05 but on the second watering of the crop about a month later c was ·02 to ·03 and about the same on a third watering. It was found that at the first commencement the rate of absorption was much affected by the state of the surface of the ground but that the effect was only temporary. The losses were found to be as follows:
| Day. | Loss per Day. | Loss per Hour. (c) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feet. | Feet. | |||
| 1st | 1 | ·36 | ·057 | |
| 2nd | 1 | ·13 | ·047 | |
| 3rd | 1 | ·07 | ·046 | |
| 4th | 1 | ·02 | ·043 | |
| 5th | ·96 | ·041 | ||
| 6th | ·90 | ·037 | ||
| 7th | ·80 | ·033 | ||
| 8th | ·77 | ·032 | ||
| Total | 8 | ·01 | ||
In the eight days the total loss was almost exactly eight feet.
The losses by absorption in the various channels of certain canals has been estimated to be as follows:—
| Channel. | Nature of soil. | Mean depth of water in Channel. | Value of (c) | Loss per Million square feet of wetted surface. | Remarks. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feet. | c. ft. per sec. | |||||||||
| Main | Line | Upper Bari Doab Canal | Shingle and Sandy Soil | 6 | ·035 | 9·7 | - | Fairly reliable estimates based on discharge observations. | ||
| „ | „ | Sirhind Canal | Sandy Soil | 7 | 9·0 | |||||
| Branches | Upper Bari Doab Canal | Loam | ·0079 | 2·2 | ||||||
| „ | Sirhind Canal | Sandy Soil | 5·2 | |||||||
| Distributaries | Upper Bari Doab Canal | Loam | ·012 | [4] | 2·3 to 4·4 (average 3·3) | - | Somewhat rough estimates. | |||
| „ | Sirhind Canal | Sandy Soil | 5 to 12 (average 8·0) | |||||||
| Watercourses | Upper Bari Doab Canal | Loam | ·015 to ·045 | [4] [5] | 3·3 to 20 (average 9·4) | |||||
| „ | Sirhind Canal | Sandy Soil | 7 to 60 (average 22) | |||||||
[4] When the channel was in continuous flow.
[5] Maximum value when flow was intermittent.
Some information as to losses of water is also given in [Chapter IV. Art. 2].
The relative losses of water in the channels of the Upper Bari Doab Canal were as follows:—