[II 166]
[II 169]
[II 15]

The progress made in naval architecture under the reign of Louis XIV is noted as follows in the work: Le Musée de Marine du Louvre. “The rake of the bow is less exaggerated, the after castle is lowered, the artillery is well distributed; the masts are better proportioned and the spread of canvas is much greater, as well as more handy, making the motion more rapid and the manœuvres more easy. The profusion and elegance of the ornaments have reached their highest point; they had the kind of poetry of the old chivalry. Everything in this navy already caused the perfection, which the ship reached quickly under the next two reigns, to be anticipated.”

Naval architecture took a great start. Many works were published, of which those of Bernouilli (1738) and of Euler (1749), treating of the stability of ships, are the best known.

The dimensions of vessels continue steadily to increase. Ships mounting 70 guns which, in 1715, were rated in the first class were passed to the sixth class in 1765.

The French fleet in 1750, according to the Musée de Marine du Louvre, was composed as follows:

NUMBER
OF
GUNS

Length
between
perpendic­ulars

Beam
at main
frame

Moulded
depth

BATTERIES

Crew

Calibres
of guns

THREE DECKERS

M.

M.

M.

Men

30

pdrs in

lower

tier

120

56.84 to 60.42

14.61 to 16.24

7.47 to 8.12

3 covered batteries with forecastles and poops.

1000 to 1200

18

middle

110(1)

54.57 to 57.82

14.94 to 15.59

7.31 to 7.80

1000 to 1100

12

upper

100

53.27 to 57.49

14.61 to 15.26

7.47 to 7.63

 900 to 1000

6

on forecastle

 90

51.97 to 55.22

14.29 to 14.91

6.81 to 7.46

 850 to 900

4

on poop deck

DOUBLE DECKERS

 80

50.67 to 54.57

13.96 to 14.61

6.66 to 6.98

2 covered batteries with forecastle and poop

 750 to 800

36

pdrs in

lower

tier

18

upper

8

on forecastle

4

on poop

74

48.72 to 53.27

13.64 to 13.96

6.50 to 6.98

2 covered batteries with forecastle and poop

 650 to 700

36 or 24 pdrs in lower tier

8 pdrs in upper tier

8 or 6 pdrs on fore­castle

4 pdrs on poop

64(2)

46.04 to 48.72

12.66 to 12.99

6.00 to 6.50

2 batteries and forecastle

 450 to 500

18 or 12 pdrs in lower tier

24 or 18 pdrs in upper tier

6 pdrs on fore­castle

50

43.84 to 45.17

11.36 to 12.01

5.50 to 5.85

2 batteries and forecastle

 300 to 660

12 or 8 pdrs in lower tier

18 or 12 pdrs in upper tier

6 or 4 pdrs on fore­castle

FRIGATES

40

38.98 to 42.22

10.71 to 11.04

5.19 to 5.53

Single battery with fore­castle

 280 to 300

12 pdrs in battery
6 or 4 pdrs on fore­castle

30

35.07 to 38.98

 9.74 to 10.39

4.55 to 5.20

do.

 200 to 230

10

33.13 to 35.73

 8.77 to  9.10

4.22 to 4.55

do.

 130 to 150

CORVETTES

 12

19.49 to 22.74

 7.85 to  8.30

2.92 to 3.23

Single battery without fore­castle.

  70 to 80

4 pdrs in barbette battery.

(1) There were a few intermediate types classified with those of this list which they approached nearest.

(2) This ship was the smallest of those which could enter the line of battle.

France also exercised a great influence on the design of ships. (HOLMES, p. 114, ab initio.) The most beautiful vessel of this time was the Sans Pareil.

The work mentioned above, Le Musée de Marine du Louvre, contains a passage relating to the time of Louis XVI (1744-1793) which is well worthy of our attention (Chapter VII): “It was the moment when the science of shipbuilding, born in Holland, really passed into France”. This does not alter the fact that, even at the end of the XVIIIth century, people still went to Holland to study this art, in spite of the high degree of perfection which it had reached in France. Here indeed is what the above mentioned work says: “People went at the end of the last (XVIIIth) century to take lessons in Holland and, on this subject, the library at Brest has a manuscript of one of the celebrated engineers, Olivier, who had been sent there, about 1780, to study construction.”