[89] The Tudor kings were doubtless of British descent; but they did not reign by virtue of that descent, and they did not come in till ages after the English kingdom was completely formed.

[90] See Norman Conquest, vol. i. p. 580.

[91] It should be remembered that the principality became the appanage of the eldest son only by accident. The first English prince, afterwards Edward the Second, was not his father’s eldest son at the time of his creation. The title moreover is newly created each time.

[92] See Norman Conquest, vol. i. p. 48; and Macmillan’s Magazine, April, 1880.

[93] The Latin colonia certainly does not imply independence; but, the word colony, in our use of it, rather answers to the Greek ἀποικία which does.

[94] It may be well to give the dates in order:—

Plymouth1620
Massachusetts1628
New Hampshire1629
Connecticut1635
Newhaven1638
Providence1644
Rhode Island1634
Maine1638
New Hampshire annexed by Massachusetts1641
Rhode Island and Providence united1644
Connecticut and Newhaven united1664
New Hampshire separated from Massachusetts1671
Maine purchased by Massachusetts1677
Plymouth and Massachusetts united1691

[Transcriber’s note: The following changes have been made to this text: