[997] Cf. Stubbs, Const. Hist. i. 211 et seqq. with 245.
[998] So we read of Henry the First in Florence, 1102; “Duos de clericis duobus episcopatibus investivit, Rogerium videlicet cancellarium episcopatu Saresbyriensi, et Rogerium larderarium suum pontificatu Herefordensi.”
[999] See N. C. vol. v. p. 662, and Contemporary Review, 1878, pp. 493, 496.
[1001] See N. C. vol. iv. p. 372.
[1002] We shall come to this again. This state of feeling is implied in Eadmer’s whole description of the time immediately before Anselm’s appointment.
[1003] We have seen even under the reign of the Confessor (see N. C. vol. ii. p. 69, and above, [p. 348]) a notion afloat that the archbishopric of Canterbury was to be had by bribery; but it was to be bribery carried on in some very underhand way, not in the form of open gifts either to King Eadward or to Earl Godwine. The appointment of Stigand (see N. C. vol. ii. p. 347) might be said to be the reward of temporal services; but they were services done to the whole nation, and the reward was bestowed by the nation itself.
[1004] See N. C. vol. ii. p. 69. Cf. Appendix I.
[1006] See N. C. vol. iv. p. 436.