p. 380, [note 4]. We have had one or two other cases of a church tenant like this Eadric or Godric, giving back his lease by way of a benefaction.
[p. 389, l. 18]. The imperial dignity of Matilda is greatly enlarged on by the poet of Draco Normannicus, i. 4. Two lines are,
“Suscipit Henricus sponsam, statimque coronat,
Hoc insigne decus maxima Roma dedit.”
[p. 396, l. 4]. See vol. i. p. 184.
[p. 413, l. 6] from bottom, for “in a neighbour” read “a neighbour in.”
[p. 416, l. 1]. I cannot admit the statement of Flambard’s Durham biographer, who puts his restoration at this point. It is not so much that he had no claim to restoration by the general terms of the treaty, for he might have been specially included in it. But his restoration at this time is quite inconsistent with Orderic’s account of his dealings with the bishopric of Lisieux, which cannot be mere confusion or invention.
[p. 450, l. 3]. After the words “give thanks to the Lord God,” insert “for thou hast now begun to be a free king.”
[p. 454, l. 13 from bottom], for “his” read “the King’s.”
[p. 472, l. 1]. This grant of Northallerton must be the same as the grant mentioned in the charter which I have quoted in p. [535]; cf. pp. [299], [508].
[p. 487, ll. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.] It does not appear that any of the regular assemblies of the year 1101 was held at Windsor. The Whitsun assembly (see [p. 399]) may have been held there, but it is hardly likely. But the mere confirmation of an earlier grant need not have been made in a regular gemót.