[1888] Kohler, in ‘Zeitschr. f. vgl. Rechtswiss.,’ vol. iii. pp. 361, et seq. Professor Kohler also thinks (‘Krit. Vierteljahrschr. f. Gesetzg.,’ N. S. vol. iv. p. 181) that one of the chief causes of exogamy was the unpleasantly dependent position in which, in endogamous marriage, the husband stood to the family of his wife.
[1889] Tylor, in ‘Jour. Anthr. Inst.,’ vol. xviii. p. 267.
[1890] Curr, loc. cit. vol. i. p. 100. Mathew, in ‘Jour. Roy. Soc. N.S. Wales,’ vol. xxiii. p. 403. Dawson, loc. cit. p. 28. Frazer, loc. cit. pp. 58, et seq. There seem to be two or three exceptions to this rule among the Australian tribes, but Mr. Curr (vol. i. p. 417) ascribes such cases to the influence of the whites.
[1891] Codrington, loc. cit. p. 23.
[1892] Holm, loc. cit. p. 98.
[1893] Prichard, loc. cit. p. 125.
[1894] Tylor, in ‘Jour. Anthr. Inst.,’ vol. xviii. p. 265.
[1895] Morgan, ‘Ancient Society,’ p. 424.
[1896] Lubbock, ‘The Customs of Marriage and Systems of Relationship among the Australians,’ in ‘Jour. Anthr. Inst.,’ vol. xiv. p. 300. Darwin, ‘Animals and Plants under Domestication,’ vol. ii. p. 124. Peschel, loc. cit. p. 224.
[1897] Maine, ‘Early Law and Custom,’ p. 228.