[2278] Wilkes, loc. cit. vol. ii. p. 138.
[2279] Waitz-Gerland, vol. v. pt. ii. p. 191.
[2280] Bink, in ‘Bull. Soc. d’Anthr.,’ ser. iii. vol. xi. p. 396.
[2281] Wilken, in ‘Bijdragen,’ &c., ser. v. vol. i. p. 183. Riedel, loc. cit. pp. 69, 133, 415.
[2282] Bodo, Hos, Mundas, Kúrmis (Dalton, loc. cit. pp. 86, 192, 194, 319), Bhils, Káttis, Oráons (Rowney, loc. cit. pp. 37, 46, 81), Gonds (Forsyth, loc. cit. pp. 149, et seq.), Chittagong Hill tribes (Lewin, loc. cit. p. 92), Savaras (Fawcett, in ‘Jour. Anthr. Soc. Bombay,’ vol. i. p. 235).
[2283] Burckhardt, loc. cit. pp. 61, 62, 150, 153. According to Professor Robertson Smith (loc. cit. p. 72), instances of marriage by capture might be accumulated to an indefinite extent from Arabian history and tradition. At the time of Mohammed the practice was universal.
[2284] Huc, loc. cit. vol. i. p. 185.
[2285] Kirghiz (Atkinson, ‘Travels in the Regions of the Upper and Lower Amoor,’ pp. 250, et seq.), Chulims (Georgi, loc. cit. p. 231), Mordvins (Mainoff, ‘Mordvankansan häätapoja’).
[2286] Prejevalsky, ‘Mongolia,’ vol. ii. p. 121.
[2287] Castrén, loc. cit. vol. ii. p. 168.