[370.1] See Lubbock, 131, 535; MacLennan, 341; Westermarck, 72. An exception must be made for the Babylonian and similar cases which do not appear referable to the exercise of communal marriage-rights.
[371.1] i. Risley, 229.
[371.2] i. Risley, 231. A similar distinction of guilt is drawn by the Dhánuks (i. ibid., 221), the Ghasiyas of South Mirzapur (i. N. Ind. N. and Q., 167), the Dusadhs (ii. ibid., 32), the Kharwars (ii. ibid., 34), the Bhuts, though nominally Mohammedan (ii. ibid., 50), and other tribes. So also in Ladák, iii. N. Ind. N. and Q., 168.
[371.3] i. N. Ind. N. and Q., 168.
[371.4] Featherman, Drav., 184.
[372.1] Featherman, Aoneo-Mar., 590.
[372.2] Herod. i. 216.
[372.3] Forbes, in xiii. Journ. Anthr. Inst., 426; Trumbull, 54.
[373.1] Robertson Smith, Kinship, 137.
[373.2] Risley, passim. So also the Chukmas of the Chittagong Hills; Lewin, 187. And the Chinese; i. Gray, 219.