[428] Linc. Visit. II, p. 133.
[429] See below, pp. [395], [396].
[430] Linc. Visit. II, p. 121. Alnwick notes “Amoueatur quedam francigena manens in prioratu propter vite inhonestatem, nam omnes admittit vniformiter ad concubitus suos”; and see his general injunction, ib. pp. 122, 125.
[431] Ancren Riwle, introd. Gasquet (King’s Classics), p 287.
[432] Alnwick’s Visit. MS. f. 7.
[433] Ib. f. 26d.
[434] E.H.R. VI, p. 33.
[435] Liveing, op. cit. p. 101.
[436] Ib. p. 104. Compare Peckham’s injunctions to Wherwell in 1284 “Et si quis inveniatur, serviens masculus aut femina, qui amaris responsionibus consueverit monialem aliquam vel aliquas molestare, nisi se monitione praemissa sufficienter corrigat in futurum, illico expellatur.” Reg. Epist. J. Peckham, II, p. 654; also his injunctions to Barking and Holy Sepulchre, Canterbury, ib. I, p. 85; II, p. 707. Also Thomas of Cantilupe’s injunctions to Lingbrook, c. 1277. Reg. Thome de Cantilupo, p. 202.
[437] New Coll. MS. f. 87d.