Essays on the Greek Romances

by Elizabeth Hazelton Haight

[357]B. E. Perry, op. cit., pp. 52-55.

[358]M. Croiset, op. cit., p. 48.

[359]Harmon, op. cit., V, 101-207.

[360]M. Rostovtzeff, Seminarium Kondakovianum, II, 135-38, Prague, 1928; Papyri Greci e Latini, VIII. No. 981. For a different point of view see F. Zimmermann, “Lukians Toxaris und das Kairener Romanfragment” in Philologische Wochenschrift, 55 (1935), 1211-16.

[361]R. M. Rattenbury, “Romance: the Greek Novel” in New Chapters in the History of Greek Literature, Third Series, pp. 240-44.

[362]M. Rostovtzeff, Scythien und der Bosporus, Berlin, 1931, I, 96-99.

[363]M. Croiset, op. cit., p. 51.

[364]Quis ille? Met. I. 1.

[365]E. H. Haight, Apuleius and his Influence, New York, 1927; “The Myth of Cupid and Psyche in Ancient Art” in Art and Archaeology, III (1916), 43-52, 87-97; “The Myth of Cupid and Psyche in Renaissance Art,” “The Vassar College Psyche Tapestries,” in Art and Archaeology, XV (1923), 107-116; “Apuleius’ Art of Story-Telling” in Essays on Ancient Fiction, New York, 1936.

[366]From E. H. Haight, “Apuleius’ Art of Story-Telling,” in Essays on Ancient Fiction, New York, 1936, p. 152.