A soldier sustained a penetrating wound of the back of the thorax on the left side and received an injection of antitetanic serum. A few days later, May 18, 1915, he came on hospital service very sick, with high temperature and marked suppuration. The next day he had an anxious facies, temperature of 40 degrees, and sharp pains in the left arm. This arm May 21 was still very painful and then began to make involuntary movements in the shape of incessant clonic contractions. The forearm would suddenly flex upon the upper arm, and the upper arm itself would violently push itself forward and outward. Meantime, the wrist and fingers were not involved in the contractions. The movements were continuous, but paroxysmally increased in extent.
Babinski, called in consultation, confirmed the diagnosis of an anomalous form of tetanus. Next day trismus, pleurosthotonos, and stiff neck developed. Antitetanic serum and chloral had been given from the beginning, with morphine at night. The patient, however, died with asphyxia June 3.
Re brachial monoplegia, the hysterotraumatic form first observed by Charcot has an anesthesia with the shoulder of mutton distribution, slightly affecting the thorax in front and behind, in addition to the paralysis.
Paralysis of right leg: Hysterical? Organic? “Micro-organic?”
Case 410. (Von Sarbo, January, 1915.)
A Lieutenant, aged 28, lost consciousness September 6, 1914, as the result of a shell explosion. When consciousness returned in the hospital, he could not remember what had happened. The last he remembered was that he had been pushing forward with his troop. There had been no psychic shock whatever. Examined September 15, he showed a right-sided hemiplegia with stiffness of the right lower extremity so that it could not be even passively flexed. It was with difficulty he could walk and he dragged his right foot. Patellar reflex could not be elicited on the right. Oppenheim and Babinski were absent. There was a slight nystagmus on looking to the right. Pupils normal. Tongue deviated to the left. Speech was slow and the man had to think a little over some expressions. He could not feel touch so well on the right as on the left and this hypesthesia grew more marked distally. He was greatly bothered because certain words did not come to him readily, especially names.
The absence of the Babinski and Oppenheim reflexes was against an organic hypothesis and the absence of hysterical stigmata and the non-characteristic sensory disorder, as well as the absence of any psychic shock in the history, spoke against hysteria. The hypoglossus paralysis spoke in favor of the organic nature of the disease.
According to von Sarbo we must look for the background of so-called functional nervous disorders, hysteria and neurasthenia, in structural changes of the nervous system, the changes that Charcot called molecular. But the lesions, he believes, do not lead to a degeneration of neurons. Accordingly we get only the external form of organic paralysis without concomitant symptoms, such as Oppenheim and Babinski reflexes. Von Sarbo terms his hypothesis that of “microörganic” changes. To prove the hysterical nature of a condition we must show first that the symptoms have taken their rise on a mental or moral basis.