Physiology: The Science of the Body

by Ernest G. Martin

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Muscular Coordination—Weissmuller’s Horizontal Plunge into a Swimming Pool	[Frontispiece]
	FACING PAGE
Factory’s Cooperation in Aiding Physical Fitness, Underweight Employes Are Given a Milk Lunch	[32]
Weight Test in a Child’s Physical Examination to Determine How Nearly the Child Approaches Correct Standards of Physical Development	[33]
French Method of Measuring Vertical Conformation, Considered Valuable in Advising and Training Athletes	[64]
Curve of the Spine Measured and Drawn for Study of an Athlete’s Possibilities	[65]
Muscular Development of an Athlete—The Discus Thrower of Myron	[80]
A Modern “Victory”—Miss Sabie at Practice	[81]
Hospital Designed to Supply the Maximum of Light and Air—Chief Requisites for Health—to Each Room	[96]
Architect’s Plan Made with the Need for Light and Air in Mind	[97]
Soft, Restful Colors of a Hospital Room	[112]
Magnet Put to the Service of Removing Iron Filings from the Eye	[113]
Test for Blood Pressure	[192]
Indican Test in Urinalysis	[193]
Microscopic Study of the Blood	[208]
Microphotograph of Brain Tissue	[209]
X-Raying the Teeth and Jaw—Health Often Depends on Their Good Condition	[224]
Throat Examination—Important in Determining Physical Condition	[225]
Lunch Hour in French School Where Exercise, Out-of-Door Life, Sunshine and Fresh Air are Considered Essentials	[288]
Diet Kitchen on a U. S. Hospital Ship	[289]
Caring for the Ears—Important for Adults and Babies Alike	[336]
Baby’s Footprint—a Means of Positive Identification	[336]
Babies, Physically and Mentally Active	[337]

CHAPTER I
THE SIGNS OF LIFE

PHYSIOLOGY is the study of living things, so the first thing to be asked when we begin to think about physiology is how we are to know whether anything is alive or not. It is usually pretty easy to tell whether a dog or cat is alive or dead, although sometimes when a dog is stretched out on the road we have to look closely to tell whether he has already met his end or is merely courting it by sleeping in the public highway. There are in the world hosts of animals with which we are not familiar, and to tell whether these are alive or dead is often a puzzle. More than one picnicker has been thoroughly surprised by seeing what looked like a bit of dead twig begin to walk away, and recognized the walking stick. On the whole we will agree that the sign of life which we find most reliable is motion of some sort on the part of the living animal. If the stretched-out dog makes breathing movements, we pronounce him alive; if not, we decide that he is dead. It is because the walking stick moves off when disturbed that we know it is not a twig. But while motion is the thing we look for in living animals we know perfectly well that it would be foolish to assert that anything that moves is alive. When the wind is blowing the air may be full of dead leaves and butterflies, all moving, but only part, the butterflies, alive. Unless the motion is produced by the animal itself it is not good as a sign of life. So widespread among animals is the making of movements, either on their own account, or when disturbed, that we shall not often find ourselves mistaken if we decide that an object which remains quiet indefinitely is not a living animal. Now how about the other side of the question? Is anything that moves on its own account or when disturbed to be judged alive?

Suppose that the inhabitants of Mars have finally succeeded in perfecting a flying boat that can be hermetically sealed and shot across space from that planet to our earth. Suppose further, that the first exploring party has set forth on a voyage of discovery, and has reached a point high in our sky from which objects on the earth’s surface begin to be distinguishable. Of course the huge landmarks, cities, lakes, and rivers, have been in view for a long while, and now the explorers are on the lookout for signs of living things. They are watching, just as we would be, for moving objects. The first moving thing that they see will probably be a train, and we can imagine their speculations as to whether they are actually looking or not at an inhabitant of the earth. As their craft sinks toward the surface the make-up of the train becomes perceptible as also the fact that it runs on rails, showing that it is a mechanical contrivance and not a living being. As smaller objects come into view black, shiny specks are seen moving about. These show every appearance of life; they start and stop; pass each other without interference; in fact conduct themselves about as animals usually do. If their apparent great power has the effect of discouraging the exploring party, so that they give up further investigation and fly away to Mars, the inhabitants of that planet will always suppose the earth to be populated by automobiles. We know that automobiles are not alive, yet, as this little allegory shows, they behave enough like living beings to deceive distant observers. There must be some sign of life which will apply to an animal and not to an automobile; what is it? Evidently what the Martian explorers missed was the fact that the automobile does not really start or stop itself, or guide itself past obstructions. If it had been alive, it would have done these things of itself. It is not so much the power of motion, then, that proves that the thing is alive as the power of making motions that are under the control of the animal itself.

The sight of an automobile which is not alive behaving as though it were because it is under control of a driver who is alive may lead us to ask whether the animal that we know to be living is actually alive in all its parts, or is a dead mechanism of some sort which has somewhere within it a living controller, corresponding to the living driver of the car. The animals with which we are most familiar are ourselves; how is it with our own bodies? Are they alive in all their parts, or is the brain the only part of us which is living? When a patient goes under ether on the operating table, or even when he is sound asleep, the signs of life are not conspicuously present; the heart goes on beating, to be sure, but so does the engine of an automobile go on running when the driver is away, provided he has not shut it off. A favorite belief among the Hindus is that when they go into a trance the body actually becomes lifeless while the living spirit soars among the heights. How are we to decide whether the Hindus are right or not? Evidently we shall have to look deeper than we have thus far, and learn something of what is actually going on in the different parts of our bodies when we are asleep and when we are awake.

Nearly everyone learns in school the main facts about the construction of the body; that there is a bony skeleton which supports the softer parts; that motions are made by muscles; that sense organs inform us as to what is going on in the world around; that the brain is the seat of the mind; that heart, lungs, stomach, kidneys, and other organs contribute in various ways to our well-being. Not so many go into detail as to the make-up of these organs, or into the way in which they do their work. This is not a simple matter, for several reasons. The first is that the construction units are so tiny that they cannot be seen by the unaided eye, but must be studied under the high magnification of a first-class microscope. It is much harder to make out the manner of the working of tiny pieces of machinery than of those that are of convenient size. When the parts are as small as those that make up our bodies, the task of finding out how they operate is so difficult that even now, after years of study, there are many details about which we know very little.

The construction units have been named cells. In some tiny animals the whole body consists of but one cell; all higher animals, including ourselves, have millions of cells making up the body. Undoubtedly some cells are alive; our question is as to whether all of them are, or whether there are some that are alive and some that are not. There are parts of our bodies, and of the bodies of nearly all other kinds of animals, as well, that are certainly not alive. Examples are the hair, the nails, the enamel of the teeth, and the hard parts of the bones. Actual living stuff is very soft and liquid. It is too fragile to hold its own structure except in the very tiniest animals; those that are larger need some additional supporting framework. In a body the size of a man’s the supporting framework amounts to a very considerable percentage of the entire weight (25 per cent). Not only is there the large bony skeleton, but between and among the individual cells is a framework made up of fine fibers and sheets which hold the cells in place. This latter framework is called connective tissue; we run across it in the gristly parts of meat. It makes up the stringy mass that clings to the cutter of the meat grinder when beef is being ground for Hamburg steak. We shall consider later how all this supporting material is made and put in place. Just now we are interested in the cells, and in determining whether all of them are alive or not.

There are many different kinds of cells in the body; some are muscle cells, others nerve cells, still others gland cells, and so on. Careful study shows, however, that at bottom all cells are alike. All are composed of one kind of substance to which has been given the name of protoplasm, meaning first or primary flesh. It is because some, at least, of this protoplasm is alive that our bodies are alive, and our physical life consists of nothing more than the combined life of all the living protoplasm which our bodies contain. Is there any way by which to tell whether any particular mass of protoplasm is alive or not? In other words, what are the signs of life of protoplasm as contrasted with the signs of life of whole animals?