[10.42] I. Cor. vii. 7, 8, and the context.
[10.43] I. Cor. vii. 7, 8; ix. 5. This second passage is far from being demonstrative. Phil. iv. 3, would imply the contrary. Comp. Clement of Alexandria, Strom. iii. 6, and Euseb. Hist. Eccl. iii. 30. The passage I. Cor. vii. 7, 8 alone has any weight on this point.
[10.44] I. Cor. vii. 7–9.
[10.45] Acts xxii. 3; xxvi. 4.
[10.46] Ibid. xxii. 3. Paul does not speak of this matter in certain parts of his Epistles where he would naturally mention him (Phil. iii. 5). There is an absolute contradiction between the principles of Gamaliel (Acts v. 34, etc.) and the conduct of Paul before his conversion.
[10.47] Gal. i. 13, 14; Acts xxii. 3; xxvi. 5.
[10.48] II. Cor. v. 16, does not implicate him. The passages Acts xxii. 3, xxvi. 4, give reason to believe that Paul was at Jerusalem at the same time as Jesus. But it does not follow that he saw him.
[10.49] Acts xxii. 4, 19; xxvi. 10, 11.
[10.50] Ibid. xxvi. 11.
[10.51] High-Priest from 37 to 42; Jos. Ant. XVIII. v. 3; XIX. vi. 2.