The apparatus employed to test the ionization of the air is shown in [Fig. 103]. C is an electroscope connected with a wire net, Z. The active air was introduced into a large bell-jar of 27 litres capacity, the inside of which was covered with wire netting, MM´. The bell-jar rested on an iron plate AB. The electroscope could be charged by the rod S. The rate of discharge of the electroscope, before the active air was introduced, was noted. On allowing the active air to enter, the rate of discharge increased rapidly, rising in the course of a few hours in one experiment to 30 times the original value. They found that the emanation produced excited activity on the walls of the containing vessel. The air sucked up from the earth was even more active than that observed in caves and cellars. There can thus be little doubt that the abnormal activity observed in caves and cellars is due to a radio-active emanation, present in the earth, which gradually diffuses to the surface and collects in places where the air is not disturbed.
Results similar to those obtained by Elster and Geitel for the air removed from the earth at Wolfenbüttel were also obtained later by Ebert and Ewers[[397]] at Munich. They found a strongly active emanation in the soil, and, in addition, examined the variation with time of the activity due to the emanation in a sealed vessel. After the introduction of the active air into the testing vessel, the activity was observed to increase for several hours, and then to decay, according to an exponential law, with the time, falling to half value in about 3·2 days. This rate of decay is more rapid than that observed for the radium emanation, which decays to half value in a little less than four days. The increase of activity with time is probably due to the production of excited activity on the walls of the vessel by the emanation. In this respect it is analogous to the increase of activity observed when the radium emanation is introduced into a closed vessel. No definite experiments were made by Ebert and Ewers on the rate of decay of this excited activity. In one experiment the active emanation, after standing in the vessel for 140 hours, was removed by sucking ordinary air of small activity through the apparatus. The activity rapidly fell to about half value, and this was followed by a very slow decrease of the activity with time. This result indicates that about half the rate of discharge observed was due to the radiation from the emanation and the other half to the excited activity produced by it.
The apparatus employed by Ebert and Ewers in these experiments was very similar to that employed by Elster and Geitel, shown in [Fig. 103]. Ebert and Ewers observed that, when the wire net attached to the electroscope was charged negatively, the rate of discharge observed was always greater than when it was charged positively. The differences observed between the two rates of discharge varied between 10 and 20 per cent. A similar effect has been observed by Sarasin, Tommasina and Micheli[[398]] for a wire made active by exposure to the open air. This difference in the rates of discharge for positive and negative electricity is probably connected with the presence of particles of dust or small water globules suspended in the gas. The experiments of Miss Brooks ([section 181]) have shown that the particles of dust present in the air containing the thorium emanation become radio-active. A large proportion of these dust particles acquire a positive charge and are carried to the negative electrode in an electric field. This effect would increase the rate of discharge of the electroscope when charged negatively. In later experiments, Ebert and Ewers noticed that, in some cases, when the air had been kept in the vessel for several days, the effect was reversed, and the electroscope showed a great rate of discharge when charged positively.
Fig. 103.
J. J. Thomson[[399]] has observed that the magnitude of the ionization current depends on the direction of the electric field, if fine water globules are suspended in the ionized gas.
In later experiments, Ebert[[400]] found that the radio-active emanation could be removed from the air by condensation in liquid air. This property of the emanation was independently discovered by Ebert before he was aware of the results of Rutherford and Soddy on the condensation of the emanations of radium and thorium. To increase the amount of radio-active emanation in a given volume of air, a quantity of the active air, obtained by sucking the air from the soil, was condensed by a liquid air machine. The air was then allowed partially to evaporate, but the process was stopped before the point of volatilization of the emanation was reached. This process was repeated with another quantity of air and the residues added together. Proceeding in this way, he was able to concentrate the emanation in a small volume of air. On allowing the air to evaporate, the ionization of the air in the testing vessel increased rapidly for a time and then slowly diminished. Ebert states that the maximum for the emanation which had been liquefied for some time was reached earlier than for fresh air. The rate of decay of activity of the emanation was not altered by keeping it at the temperature of liquid air for some time. In this respect it behaves like the emanations of radium and thorium.
J. J. Thomson[[401]] found that air bubbled through Cambridge tap water showed much greater conductivity than ordinary air. The air was drawn through the water by means of a water pump into a large gasometer, when the ionization current was tested with a sensitive electrometer. When a rod charged negatively was introduced into this conducting air it became active. After an exposure for a period of 15 to 30 minutes in the conducting gas, the rod, when introduced into a second testing vessel, increased the saturation current in the vessel to about five times the normal amount. Very little effect was produced when the rod was uncharged or charged positively for the same time. The activity of the rod decayed with the time, falling to half value in about 40 minutes. The amount of activity produced on a wire under constant conditions was independent of the material of the wire. The rays from the rod were readily absorbed in a few centimetres of air.
These effects were, at first, thought to be due to the action of the small water drops suspended in the gas, for it was well known that air rapidly drawn through water causes a temporary increase in its conductivity. Later results, however, showed that there was a radio-active emanation present in Cambridge tap water. This led to an examination of the waters from deep wells in various parts of England, and J. J. Thomson found that, in some cases, a large amount of emanation could be obtained from the well water. The emanation was released either by bubbling air through the water or by boiling the water. The gases obtained by boiling the water were found to be strongly active. A sample of air mixed with the radio-active emanation was condensed. The liquefied gas was allowed to evaporate, and the earlier and later portions of the gas were collected in separate vessels. The final portion was found to be about 30 times as active as the first portion.
An examination of the radio-active properties of the active gases so obtained has been made by Adams[[402]]. He found that the activity of the emanation decayed, according to an exponential law, with the time, falling to half value in about 3·4 days. This is not very different from the rate of decay of the activity of the radium emanation, which falls to half value in a little less than four days. The excited activity produced by the emanation decayed to half value in about 35 minutes. The decay of the excited activity from radium is at first irregular, but after some time falls off, according to an exponential law, diminishing to half value in 28 minutes. Taking into account the uncertainty attaching to measurements of the very small ionization observed in these experiments, the results indicate that the emanation obtained from well water in England is similar to, if not identical with, the radium emanation. Adams observed that the emanation was slightly soluble in water. After well water had been boiled for a while and then put aside, it was found to recover its power of giving off an emanation. The amount obtained after standing for some time was never more than 10 per cent. of the amount first obtained. Thus it is probable that the well water, in addition to the emanations mixed with it, has also a slight amount of a permanent radio-active substance dissolved in it. Ordinary rain water or distilled water does not give off an emanation.