Such data as the above may be used in approximately estimating the probable available rainfall of a district; but a much more accurate and satisfactory method is to measure the actual discharge of the streams, and the quantity lost by evaporation, at the same time that the rain-gauge observations are made, and so to find the actual proportion of available to total rainfall.

The following Table gives the mean annual rainfall in various parts of the world;—

Table of Rainfall. Collected by G. J. Symons.
Country and Station. Period
of
Observations.
Latitude.Mean
Annual
Fall.
EUROPE. years° ′ins.
Austria—Cracow 550 4N33·1
Prague 4750 5 15·1
Vienna 1048 12 19·6
Belgium—Brussels 2050 51 28·6
Ghent 1351 4 30·6
Louvain 1250 33 28·6
Denmark—Copenhagen 1255 41 22·3
France—Bayonne 1043 29 56·2
Bordeaux 3244 50 32·4
Brest 3048 23 38·8
Dijon 2047 14 31·1
France—Lyons ..45 46 37·0
Marseilles 6043 17 19·0
Montpelier 5143 36 30·3
Nice 2043 43 55·2
Paris 4448 50 22·9
Pau 1243 19 37·1
Rouen 1049 27 33·7
Toulon ..43 4 19·7
Toulouse 5243 36 24·9
Great britain—
England, London 4051 31 24·0
„ Manchester 4053 29 36·0
„ Exeter 4050 44 33·0
„ Lincoln 4053 15 20·0
Wales, Cardiff 4051 28 43·0
„ Llandudno 4053 19 30·0
Scotland, Edinburgh 4055 57 24·0
„ Glasgow 4055 52 39·0
„ Aberdeen 4057 8 31·0
Ireland, Cork 4051 54 40·0
„ Dublin 4053 23 30·0
„ Galway 4053 15 50·0
Holland—Rotterdam ..51 55 22·0
Iceland—Reikiavik 564 8 28·0
Ionian Isles—Corfu 2239 37 42·4
Italy—Florence 843 46 35·9
Milan 6845 29 38·0
Naples 840 52 39·3
Rome 4041 53 30·9
Turin 445 5 38·6
Venice 1945 25 34·1
Malta ..35 54 15·0
Norway—Bergen 1060 24 84·8
Christiania ..59 54 26·7
Portugal—Coimbra (in Vale of Mondego) 240 13 224·0?
Lisbon 2038 42 23·0
Prussia—Berlin 652 30 23·6
Cologne 1050 55 24·0
Hanover 352 24 22·4
Potsdam 1052 24 20·3
Russia—St. Petersburg 1459 56 16·2
Archangel 164 32 14·5
Astrakhan 446 24 6·1
Finland, Uleaborg ..65 0 13·5
Sicily—Palermo 2438 8 22·8
Spain—Madrid ..40 24 9·0
Oviedo 143 22 111·1
Sweden—Stockholm 859 20 19·7
Switzerland—Geneva 7246 12 31·8
Great St. Bernard 4345 50 58·5
Lausanne 846 30 38·5
ASIA.
China—Canton 1423 6 69·3
Macao ..22 24 68·3
Pekin 739 54 26·9
India—
Ceylon, Colombo .. 6 56 91·7
„ Kandy .. 7 18 84·0
„ Adam’s Peak ..6 50100·0
Bombay 3318 56 84·7
Calcutta 2022 35 66·9
Cherrapongee ..25 16 610·3?
Darjeeling ..27 3 127·3
Madras 2213 4 44·6
Mahabuleshwur 1517 56 254·0
Malabar, Tellicherry ..11 44 116·0
Palamcotta 5 8 30 21·1
Patna ..25 40 36·7
Poonah 418 30 23·4
Malay—Pulo Penang .. 5 25 100·5
Singapore .. 1 17 190·0
Persia—Lencoran 338 44 42·8
Ooroomiah 137 28 21·5
Russia—Barnaoul 1553 20 11·8
Nertchinsk 1251 18 17·5
Okhotsk 259 13 35·2
Tiflis 641 42 19·3
Tobolsk 258 12 23·0
Turkey-Palestine, Jerusalem{14
3
31 47
31 47
65·0?
16·3
Smyrna ..38 26 27·6
AFRICA.
Abyssinia—Gondar ..12 36 37·3
Algeria—Algiers 1036 47 37·0
Constantina ..36 24 30·8
Mostaganem 135 50 22·0
Oran 235 50 22·1
Ascension 2 8 8S11·5
Cape Colony—Cape Town 2033 5224·3
Guinea—Christiansborg .. 5 30N19·2
Madeira 433 30 30·9
Mauritius—Port Louis ..20 3S35·2
Natal—Maritzburgh ..29 36 27·6
St.Helena 315 55N18·8
Sierra Leone .. 8 3086·0
Teneriffe 228 2822·3
NORTH AMERICA.
British Columbia—New Westminster 349 12 54·1
Canada—Montreal, St. Martin’s 245 31 47·3
Toronto 1643 39 31·4
Honduras—Belize 117 29 153·0
Mexico—Vera Cruz ..19 12 66·1
Russian America—Sitka 757 3 89·9
United States—Arkansas, Fort Smith 1535 23 42·1
California, San Francisco 937 48 23·4
Nebraska, Fort Kearny 640 38 28·8
New Mexico, Socorro 234 10 7·9
New York, West Point 1241 23 46·5
Ohio, Cincinnati 2039 6 46·9
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1939 57 43·6
South Carolina, Charlestown 1532 46 48·3
Texas, Matamoras 625 54 35·2
West Indies—Antigua ..17 3 39·5
Barbadoes 1013 12 75·0
„ St. Philip 2013 13 56·1
Cuba, Havannah 223 9 50·2
Matanzas 123 2 55·3
Grenada ..12 8 126·0
Guadaloupe, Basseterre ..16 5 126·9
„ Matonba ..16 5 285·8
Jamaica, Caraib ..18 3 97·0
„ Kingstown ..17 58 83·0
St. Domingo, Cape Haitien ..19 43 127·9
„ Tivoli ..19 0 106·7
Trinidad ..10 40 62·9
Virgin Isles, St. Thomas’ ..18 17 60·6
„ Tortola ..18 27 65·1
SOUTH AMERICA.
Brazil—Rio Janeiro ..22 54S58·7
S. Luis de Maranhao .. 3 0 276·0
Guyana—Cayenne 6 4 56 138·3
Demerara, George Town 5 6 50 87·9
Paramaribo .. 6 0 229·2
New Granada—La Baja 6 7 22 54·1
Marmato 15 5 29 90·0
Santa Fé de Bogota 6 4 36 43·8
Venezuela—Cumana ..10 27 7·5
Curaçoa ..12 15N26·6
AUSTRALIA.
New South Wales—Bathurst 333 24S22·7
Deniliquin 235 32 13·8
Newcastle 332 57 55·3
Port Macquarie 1231 29 70·8
Sydney 633 52 46·2
New Zealand—Auckland 236 50 31·2
Christchurch 343 45 31·7
Nelson 241 18 38·4
Taranaki 239 3 52·7
Wellington 241 17 37·8
South Australia—Adelaide 634 55 19·2
Tasmania—Hobart Town 1242 54 20·3
Victoria—Melbourne 637 49 30·9
Port Phillip 1138 30 29·2
West Australia—Albany ..35 0 32·1
York 131 55 25·4
POLYNESIA.
Society Islands—Tahiti, Papiete 517 32 45·7

Disturbances of the Strata.

The last question to be considered relates to the disturbances which may have affected the strata; for whatever may be the absorbent power of the strata, the yield of water will be more or less diminished whenever the channels of communication have suffered break or fracture.

If the strata remained continuous and unbroken, we should merely have to ascertain the dimensions and lithological character of the strata in order to determine their water value. But if the strata is broken, the interference with the subterranean transmission of water will be proportionate to the extent of the disturbance.

Although the Tertiary formations around London have probably suffered less from the action of disturbing forces than the strata of any other district of the same extent in England, yet they nevertheless now exhibit considerable alterations from their original position.

The principal change has been that which, by elevation of the sides or depression of the centre of the district, gave the Tertiary deposits their present trough-shaped form, assuming it not to be the result of original deposition. If no further change had taken place we might have expected to find an uninterrupted communication in the Lower Tertiary strata from their northern outcrop at Hertford to their southern outcrop at Croydon, as well as from Newbury on the west to the sea on the east; and the entire length of 260 miles of outcrop would have contributed to the general supply of water at the centre.

But this is far from being the case; several disturbing causes have deranged the regularity of original structure. The principal one has caused a low axis of elevation, or rather a line of flexure running east and west, following nearly the course of the Thames from the Nore to Deptford, and apparently continued thence beyond Windsor. It brings up the chalk at Cliff, Purfleet, Woolwich, and Loampit Hill to varied but moderate elevations above the river level. Between Lewisham and Deptford the chalk disappears below the Tertiary series, and does not come to the surface till we reach the neighbourhood of Windsor and Maidenhead.

There is also, probably, another line of disturbance running between some points north and south and intersecting the first line at Deptford. It passes apparently near Beckenham and Lewisham, and then, crossing the Thames near Deptford, continues up a part, if not along the whole length of the valley of the Lea towards Hoddesdon. This disturbance appears in some places to have resulted in a fracture or a fault in the strata, placing the beds on the east of it on a higher level than those on the west; and at other places merely to have produced a curvature in the strata. Prestwich states that he was unable to give its exact course, but its effect, at all events upon the water supply of London, is important, as, in conjunction with the first or Thames valley disturbance, it cuts off the supplies from the whole of Kent, and interferes most materially with the supply from Essex; for in its course up the valley of the Lea it either brings up the Lower Tertiary strata to the surface, as at Stratford and Bow, or else, as farther up the valley, it raises them to within 40 or 60 feet of the surface.