All organisms which we comprise under the name of Protista show in their external form, in their inner structure, and in all their vital phenomena, such a remarkable mixture of animal and vegetable properties, that they cannot with perfect justice be assigned either to the animal or to the vegetable kingdom; and for more than twenty years an endless and fruitless dispute has been carried on as to whether they are to be assigned to this or that kingdom. Most of Protista are so small that they can scarcely, if at all, be perceived with the naked eye. Hence the majority of them have only become known during the last fifty years, since by the help of the improved and general use of the microscope these minute organisms have been more frequently observed and more accurately examined. However, no sooner were they better known than endless disputes arose about their real nature and their position in the natural system of organisms. Many of these doubtful primary creatures botanists defined as animals, and zoologists as plants; neither of the two would own them. Others, again, were declared by botanists to be plants, and by zoologists to be animals; each claimed them. These contradictions are not altogether caused by our imperfect knowledge of the Protista, but in reality by their true nature. Indeed, most Protista present such a confused mixture of several animal and vegetable characteristics, that each investigator may arbitrarily assign them either to the animal or vegetable kingdom. Accordingly as he defines these two kingdoms, and as he looks upon this or that characteristic as determining the animal or vegetable nature, he will assign the individual classes of Protista in one case to the animal and in another to the vegetable kingdom. But this systematic difficulty has become an inextricable knot by the fact that all more recent investigations on the lowest organisms have completely effaced, or at least destroyed, the sharp boundary between the animal and vegetable kingdom which had hitherto existed, and to such a degree that its restoration is possible only by means of a completely artificial definition of the two kingdoms. But this definition could not be made so as to apply to many of the Protista.
For this and other reasons it is, in the mean time, best to exclude the doubtful beings from the animal as well as from the vegetable kingdom, and to comprise them in a third organic kingdom standing midway between the two others. This intermediate kingdom I have established as the Kingdom of the Primary Creatures (Protista), when discussing general anatomy in the first volume of my General Morphology, pp. 191-238. In my Monograph of the Monera,[(15)] I have recently treated of this kingdom, having somewhat changed its limits, and given it a more accurate definition. Of independent classes of the kingdom Protista, we may at present distinguish the following:—
1. The still living Monera; 2. The Amœboidea, or Protoplasts; 3. The Whip-swimmers, or Flagellata; 4. The Flimmer-balls, or Catallacta; 5. The Tram-weavers, or Labyrinthuleæ; 6. The Flint-cells, or Diatomeæ; 7. The Slime-moulds, or Myxomycetes; 8. The Ray-streamers, or Rhizopoda.
The most important groups at present distinguishable in these eight classes of Protista are named in the systematic table on p. [51.] Probably the number of these Protista will be considerably increased in future days by the progressive investigations of the ontogeny of the simplest forms of life, which have only lately been carried on with any great zeal. With most of the classes named we have become intimately acquainted only during the last ten years. The exceedingly interesting Monera and Labyrinthuleæ, as also the Catallacta, were indeed discovered only a few years ago. It is probable also that very numerous groups of Protista have died out in earlier periods, without having left any fossil remains, owing to the very soft nature of their bodies. We might add to the Protista from the still living lowest groups of organisms—the Fungi; and in so doing should make a very large addition to its domain. Provisionally we shall leave them among plants, though many naturalists have separated them altogether from the vegetable kingdom.
The pedigree of the kingdom Protista is still enveloped in the greatest obscurity. The peculiar combination of animal and vegetable properties, the indifferent and uncertain character of their relations of forms and vital phenomena, together with a number of several very peculiar features which separate most of the subordinate classes sharply from the others, at present baffle every attempt distinctly to make out their blood relationships with one another, or with the lowest animals on the one hand, and with the lowest plants on the other hand. It is not improbable that the classes specified, and many other unknown classes of Protista, represent quite independent organic tribes, or phyla, each of which has independently developed from one, perhaps from various, Monera which have arisen by spontaneous generation. If we do not agree to this polyphyletic hypothesis of descent, and prefer the monophyletic hypothesis of the blood relationship of all organisms, we shall have to look upon the different classes of Protista as the lower small offshoots of the root, springing from the same simple Monera root, out of which arose the two mighty and many-branched pedigrees of the animal kingdom on the one hand, and of the vegetable kingdom on the other. (Compare pp. [74], [75].) Before I enter into this difficult question more accurately, it will be appropriate to premise something further as to the contents of the classes of Protista given on the next page, and their general natural history.
| SYSTEMATIC SURVEY | ||||||
| Of the Larger and Smaller Groups of the Kingdom Protista | ||||||
| Classes of the Protista Kingdom. | Systematic Name of the Classes | Orders of Families of the Classes. | A name of a Genus as an example. | |||
| 1. Moners | Monera |
| 1. Gymnomonera | Protogenes | ||
| 2. Lepomonera | Protomyxa | |||||
| 2. Protoplasts | Amœboida |
| 1. Gymnamœbæ | Amœba | ||
| 2. Leptamœbæ | Arcella | |||||
| 3. Gregarinæ | Monocystis | |||||
| 3. Whip-swimmers |
| Flagellata |
| 1. Nudiflagellata | Euglena | |
| 2. Cilioflagellata | Peridinium | |||||
| 4. Flimmer-balls | Catallacta | 1. Catallacta | Magosphæra | |||
| 5. Tram-weavers | Labyrinthuleæ | 1. Labyrinthuleæ | Labyrinthula | |||
| 6. Flint-cells | Diatomea |
| 1. Striata | Navicula | ||
| 2. Vittata | Tabellaria | |||||
| 3. Areolata | Coscinodiscus | |||||
| 7. Slime-moulds | Myxomycetes |
| 1. Physareæ | Æthalium | ||
| 2. Stemoniteæ | Stemonitis | |||||
| 3. Trichiaceæ | Arcyria | |||||
| 4. Lycogaleæ | Reticularia | |||||
| 8. Ray-streamers or Rhizopods. (Root-feet) |
| I. Acyttaria |
| 1. Monothalamia | Gromia | |
| 2. Polythalamia | Nummulina | |||||
| II. Heliozoa | 1. Heliozoa | Actinosphærium | ||||
| III. Radiolaria |
| 1. Monocyttaria | Cyrtidosphæra | |||
| 2. Polycyttaria | Collosphæra | |||||



