Regarding the encircled numbers, so far as they are independent of 260, I would note the following:—
| 017 = XIII Akbal to IV Ahau. |
| 121 = XIII Akbal to IV Kan. |
| 196 = III Chicchan to IV Imix. |
| 199 = III Chicchan to VII Kan and XIII Akbal to IV Ik. |
| 235 = III Chicchan to IV Ahau. |
In addition let me remark that 36 = VII Kan to IV Ahau, 39 = IV Imix to IV Ahau and 104 = IV Ahau to IV Kan.
The following arrangement will prove that these numbers were as usual also employed to form the large numbers by multiplication:—
| 17 × | 74,620 = | 1,268,540 (IV Ahau), |
| 235 × | 5,252 = | 1,234,220 (IV Ahau), |
| 36 × | 42,639 = | 1,535,004 (VII Kan), |
| 39 × | 32,639 = | 1,272,921 (IV Imix), |
| 104 × | 12,236 = | 1,272,544 (IV Kan). |
But the highest number, 1,538,342, was formed in a different way; it = 59,167 × 26; but the interval from IV Ahau to IV Ik = 182 = 7 × 26, and from IV Ik to IV Ahau = 78 = 3 × 26.
If in conclusion, we now examine the twelve numbers of seven figures given in this section, we will clearly see that by twos and twos they plainly belong together in pairs:—
The three pairs of numbers found by computation are as follows:—
| 1,486,923, XIII Akbal. |
| 1,483,585, III Chicchan. |