The fact that dew is most commonly derived from the soil could have been foreseen from the other fact, long ascertained and known, that during the night the soil is as a rule warmer than the air above it; as has been shown by the earlier observers, as well as more specifically by Stockbridge.

Dew within the Soil.—It is obvious that whenever dew is formed above the surface of the soil, the air within the latter must be at or near its point of saturation with vapor, as in fact is usually the case a few inches below the surface. It follows that when a depression of temperature occurs within the soil, e. g., at night, dew must be deposited within the soil down to the depth to which the nightly variation reaches, increasing at that depth as the vapor from the warmer soil below rises, to be in its turn condensed. There is thus formed at that level a zone of greater moisture, which may sometimes be noted in digging pits, by a deeper tint, without any corresponding variation in the nature of the soil. The daily repetition of this process, at varying depths, and its greater or less recurrence at or near the limit-levels of monthly and even annual variations, must exert a not inconsiderable influence upon the vertical distribution of moisture in the soil; which instead of being usually found in horizontal bands or zones of varying moisture-contents, is usually remarkably uniform for considerable depths, despite the fitfully recurrent additions from rains. It is at least probable that this process of dew-formation within the soil materially assists capillarity in effecting a measurably uniform vertical distribution of moisture. ([See also page 207, chapter 11]).

Plant-development under different Temperature Conditions.—In the arctic regions the ground, frozen in winter to unknown depths, may thaw to only three to five feet during the summer, notwithstanding the great length and continuous sunshine of the arctic day. The shallow-rooted arctic flora develops very rapidly under the influence of the continuous daylight and heat, in the course of from five to eight weeks. The seeds of these plants must, of course, be capable of germinating at very low temperatures; and as a matter of fact, we find that both in the arctic regions and in the higher mountains, certain plants are found growing and blooming on slopes flecked with snow; each plant surrounded by a small circle of bare ground, where the snow has been melted under the influence of the dark-tinted earth and leaves. It is clear that here germination has occurred, the foliage has been formed, and the roots have been exercising their vegetable functions, in ground soaked with water practically ice-cold.

Germination of Seeds.—While wild plants of special adaptation may thrive in very low (or high) temperatures, it is also true that few of our cultivated plants will germinate, and still less grow thriftily, at such low temperatures. The limit below which most cultivated plants may be considered as remaining practically inactive lies between 4.4 and 7.2° C. (40 and 45° F.). Few tropical plants will germinate much below 23.8° (75° F.) and in some cases not below 35° Cent. (95° F.). Even maize and pumpkins, according to Haberlandt, germinate most rapidly between 35 and 38.3° C. (95 and 101° F.), while for wheat, rye, oats and flax the best temperature for germination lies between 21.1 to 26.1 (70 to 79°). Under the most favorable conditions of temperature and moisture, some small seeds which readily absorb moisture will germinate in from twenty-four to forty-eight hours, while at a lower temperature they may require from three days to two weeks. Thus Haberlandt found that while oats would germinate in two days at a temperature of 17.2 to 17.5° C. (63° to 63.5°), it took a full week for germination when the temperature was only 5° C. (41° F.). It is obvious that seeds remaining inert in the soil for such lengths of time will be subject to a variety of vicissitudes that may injure or destroy their vitality. There are many bacteria and fungous parasites which at low temperatures are perfectly capable of attacking and destroying the water-soaked seed. There is thus for each plant, from the lowest to the highest, a certain temperature most favorable to development; and both above and below this, the vegetative activity is seriously interfered with or wholly checked. A knowledge of these limits is manifestly of the utmost practical importance.

The influence of too high a temperature in preventing the germination of cinchona seed from India, was curiously exemplified when it was subjected to a supposedly favorable steady temperature of 23.8° C. (75° F.) under otherwise most favorable conditions. Not a single one came up in the course of six weeks, and the box in which it had been sown was put away outside of the hothouse as a failure. Within two weeks a full stand of seedlings was obtained, at temperatures ranging between 12.7 and 15.5° C. (55° and 60° F.). The fact that the cinchona is a tree of the lower slopes of the Andes (three to five thousand feet) although at home strictly within the tropics, explains the apparent anomaly.

PART THIRD.
CHEMISTRY OF SOILS.

CHAPTER XVIII.
THE PHYSICO-CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF
SOILS IN RELATION TO CROP PRODUCTION.

The chemical constituents of soils have been incidentally mentioned and discussed above, both in connection with the processes of soil-formation, and with the minerals that mainly participate therein. The manner of their occurrence and their relations to plant life, so far as known, must now be considered more in detail.

HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SOIL
INVESTIGATION.

While the obvious importance of the physical soil-conditions has long ago rendered them subjects of close study by Schübler[106] Boussingault and others, the chemistry of soils was very generally neglected for a considerable period, after the hopes at first entertained by Liebig that chemical analysis would furnish a direct indication and measure of soil fertility, had been sorely disappointed in respect to the only soils then investigated, viz., the long-cultivated ones of Europe. The results of chemical analysis sometimes agreed, but as often pointedly disagreed, with cultural experiences; so that after the middle of the nineteenth century, but few thought it worth while to occupy their time in chemical soil analysis.