E. A. Mitscherlich (Bodenkunds für Land-und-Forstwirthe; Berlin, 1905) attributes to the surface offered by the soil particles supreme importance in determining the productiveness of soils. According to him the internal soil-surface determines directly the ease with which roots can penetrate the soil; and he proposes the determination of this factor by means of the heat produced in wetting the soil (“Benetzungswärme”), measured in a calorimeter, as a substitute for all methods of physical soil analysis, which are vitiated by the varying shapes and densities of the particles; while his method gives directly the actual surface. To the consumption of energy required by difficult penetration he attributes most of the differences in production, and hence refers to the internal soil-surface as governing nearly all the other physical factors. The introduction of many arbitrary assumptions, and the failure to show that the admitted inaccuracy of the ordinary mechanical soil analyses are of any practical importance, greatly detract from the cogency of the rigorous mathematical discussion carried through his work by Mitscherlich.

Influence of the several grain-sizes on soil texture.—Undoubtedly the most potent of all the sediments appearing in the above table in influencing soil texture, is the “clay.” That the materials included under this empirical designation may vary considerably in different soils, has already been sufficiently insisted on; and it is doubtful that in the present imperfect state of our knowledge of the functions of the several physical grain-sizes, we would be much wiser were we to go to the extreme advocated by Williams (Forsch. Agr. Phys., vol. 18, p. 225, ff.), of determining with precision the actual amount of such extremely fine clay particles as cease altogether to obey the law of gravity when once suspended in water. It is at least doubtful that the essential property of adhesive plasticity belongs only to these, for this property doubtless increases gradually as the size diminishes, although unquestionably not a mere function of the latter, since it belongs only to the hydrated silicate of alumina.

Ferric Hydrate.—Probably the body which most commonly modifies materially the adhesive and contractile properties of the clay substance, is ferric hydrate; the more as on account of its high density it tends to exaggerate materially, in many cases, the apparent content of true clay, and the estimate of the soil’s plasticity based upon it. A good example in point is the case of soil No. 246 (Miss.) of the above table. This is a heavy clay soil, yet not excessively adhesive; scarcely as much so as No. 230 (Miss.), the heavy gray “flatwoods” soil, and not nearly as “sticky” when wet as No. 173 (Miss.), the prairie subsoil, although containing apparently 15% more clay than the former, and 7% more than the latter. But No. 246 is a highly ferruginous clay, in which the ferric hydrate is in a very finely divided condition, and materially influences the physical qualities of the clay substance. Were it all accumulated in the “clay,” it would diminish the percentage of true clay by 11.75%, reducing the clay-percentage to 28.5% which accords more nearly with the soil’s only moderate adhesiveness, and not excessively heavy tillage.

But it must be remembered that the iron oxid shown in the analysis is not nearly always in this finely diffused condition. Frequently it incrusts the sand grains; quite commonly it forms small concretions of limonite, which themselves act as sand grains; and again, it may be present in the form of “black sand” or magnetic oxid, as is commonly the case in California and on the Pacific slope generally. To take this point properly into account, therefore, it would be necessary to determine the amount of ferric hydrate actually present in the “clay” as separated by subsidence of the granular constituents.

Other substances.—This circumstance as well as the inevitable presence of other modifying substances, clearly shows the desirability of being enabled to examine the physical properties of this “clay” directly, by collecting its entire amount as obtained in analysis, instead of merely determining it by weighing fractional portions. When this is done the analysis is much more valuable as indicating the true tilling qualities of the land. The increase of bulk suffered by this substance after wetting, is a very fair index of its content of true clay, and is preferable to the chemical analysis proposed by some investigators. For it is quite impossible to distinguish the silica and alumina derived from the kaolinitic substance proper, from that which is due to the decomposition of zeolites.

It is possible, however, to determine the possible maximum of the kaolinite ingredient by taking into consideration the quantitative ratio according to which silica and alumina combine to form it, viz., approximately 46% of the former to 40 of the latter, the rest being water. By using this calculation we can often demonstrate clearly the presence in the “clay” of considerable amounts (up to 33%) of aluminic hydrate; since no zeolitic mass can contain as much alumina as does kaolinite. Whether the aluminic hydrate be in the form of gibbsite, bauxite, diaspore,[27] or in the gelatinous state, the nature of the soils containing it proves that it is totally destitute of plasticity and adhesiveness; and this consideration will often serve to explain the fact that soils showing in their chemical analysis high percentages of alumina, nevertheless show quite low degrees of plasticity, adhesiveness and water absorption. What part it may take in modifying the physical properties of the soil we can thus far only conjecture.

Influence of the granular sediments upon the tilling qualities of Soils.—Considering the granular sediments by themselves, in the absence of clay, it may be stated in a general way that while in a moist condition they flocculate sufficiently to produce a fair tilth, they will nevertheless on drying collapse into a close arrangement resulting from the single-grain structure. The form of the grains being angular instead of rounded, they are apt to form a very closely packed mass far from suitable to vegetable growth; as will be seen by an example taken from one of the culture stations of the University of California, from a piece of land which on the surface would be called a very sandy loam, but after we descend increases in its content of fine grains until at a depth varying from eighteen inches to three feet we find what appears to be a hardpan, which is equally impervious to roots and water and causes the water to stagnate to such an extent that after heavy rains the land becomes so boggy as to render plowing almost impossible without endangering the team. A close examination of this hardpan shows that, unlike others, it is devoid of any cement, and when taken out can be readily crushed between the fingers, and softens in water, but does not become plastic. Its imperviousness is therefore due solely to the close packing of the sand grains, for it contains practically no plastic clay, and under the microscope the grains are seen to be angular-wedge-shaped and composed of the remnants of granite. The physical analysis shows the following result:

MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF HARDPAN.
Designation.Diameter.Percentage.
Sand.50mm.10.93
.30“21.23
.12“ 7.27
Silt .072“ 9.63
 .047“12.00
 .036“ 7.19
 .025“ 1.25
 .016“14.20
“Clay”?  8.64

It is doubtful whether this condition of things can be remedied by the usual measure of breaking up the hardpan either by hand or by means of giant-powder blasting. Experience seems to show that the effect is only temporary, and that in the course of time, by the action of the percolating waters, the particles settle back into their original impervious condition. It is just possible, however, that if once penetrated by roots, the intervention of these would permanently destroy the close structure, so as to make this a fair subsoil for the growth of trees and other plants. The writer is not aware that this kind of purely physical hardpan without cement has ever been observed elsewhere.

This physical condition is doubtless responsible for two other phenomena, viz., the “putty soils,” and also certain difficulties experienced in irrigation.