The Nitrogen-Content of Humus.—Since soil-humus is doubtless the chief depository of soil-nitrogen, and the main source from which, through the process of nitrification, the nitrogen-supply to plants is usually derived, its content of that element is a matter of great interest. It has been customary to estimate approximately the nitrogen-content of soils by the proportion of humus-substance present; and as the light tints of the soils of the arid region indicate a small humus-content, a scarcity of nitrogen seemed to be also indicated for these lands. As this in a number of cases did not seem to accord with actual experience, an investigation of the subject was made at the California experiment station,[51] with the results shown in the subjoined table. In considering these results it must be kept in mind that while arid conditions can rarely be fulfilled in the humid region, humid conditions are quite frequently locally represented in the arid, in lowlands and on high mountains; while moderately moist benchlands represent the semi-arid regime.
HUMUS PERCENTAGE AND NITROGEN CONTENT IN
SOILS OF THE ARID AND HUMID REGIONS.
| Station Number | Soils arranged in order of nitrogen percentages in humus. | Humus in soil, per cent. | Nitrogen in Humus, per cent. | Nitrogen in soil, per cent. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soils of the Arid Region (California). | ||||
| 2061 | Dark clay loam, Arroyo Grande Valley, | 3.06 | 22.00 | .670 |
| San Luis County | ||||
| 2291 | Red soil, Orland, Glenn Co. | .71 | 21.10 | .150 |
| 1904 | Sediment Soil, Porterville, Tulare Co. | .90 | 19.50 | .180 |
| 1901 | Sandy soil near Ceres, Stanislaus Co. | .64 | 18.75 | .120 |
| 704 | Sandy soil of plains, near Fresno, Fresno Co. | .60 | 18.66 | .112 |
| 6 | Black adobe soil, Stockton, San Joaquin Co. | 1.05 | 18.66 | .196 |
| 1679 | Black adobe soil, Berkeley, Alameda Co. | 1.20 | 18.58 | .203 |
| 2324 | Clay soil of desert, Imperial, San Diego Co. | .38 | 18.40 | .070 |
| 1167 | Black clay loam soil, near Tulare, Tulare Co. | 1.66 | 18.19 | .302 |
| 1536 | Brown loam soil, Windsor Tract, Riverside, | .20 | 18.00 | .036 |
| Riverside County | ||||
| 1126 | Sandy loam soil, Paso Robles, | .55 | 17.27 | .095 |
| San Luis Obispo Co. | ||||
| 2301 | Red hill soil, Upper Lake, Lake Co. | .81 | 16.90 | .137 |
| 1607 | Plateau soil of desert, Lancaster, | .25 | 16.80 | .042 |
| Los Angeles Co. | ||||
| 1159 | Sandy plains soil, Tulare, Tulare Co. | .37 | 16.75 | .062 |
| 1900 | Sandy soil, near Modesto, Stanislaus Co. | .84 | 16.65 | .140 |
| 1113 | Clay loam soil (slate), Jackson, Amador Co. | .54 | 16.60 | .090 |
| 1149 | Adobe clay soil, near Paso Robles, | .47 | 16.18 | .074 |
| San Luis Obispo County | ||||
| 1538 | Mesa soil, Chino, San Bernardino Co. | .65 | 16.08 | .105 |
| 1147 | Sandy loam soil, Paso Robles, | .66 | 16.06 | .106 |
| San Luis Obispo County | ||||
| 2403 | Valley Soil, Wheatland, Yuba Co. | 1.50 | 16.00 | .240 |
| 1281 | Red Mesa soil, Pomona, San Bernardino Co. | .58 | 15.50 | .090 |
| 1117 | Sandy granitic soil, near Jackson, Amador Co. | .80 | 15.27 | .123 |
| 1406 | Red loam soil, Arlington Heights, Riverside, | .30 | 15.00 | .045 |
| Riverside County | ||||
| 1172 | Red clay loam soil, east of Tulare, Tulare Co. | .72 | 14.75 | .106 |
| 1958 | Sandy Mesa soil, Nipomo, San Luis Obispo Co. | .85 | 14.45 | .122 |
| 1423 | Chocolate-red soil, Carisa plain, | .39 | 14.36 | .056 |
| San Luis Obispo County | ||||
| 1291 | Sandy hill land, near Jackson, Amador Co. | .76 | 14.34 | .109 |
| 585 | Wire-grass loam soil, Visalia, Tulare Co. | 1.00 | 14.10 | .146 |
| 863 | Red ridge loam soil, Grass Valley, Nevada Co. | 2.89 | 13.91 | .402 |
| 1907 | Dark loam soil, near Chino, San Bernardino Co. | .92 | 13.26 | .121 |
| 1115 | Sandy granitic soil, near Jackson, Amador Co. | .85 | 13.20 | .112 |
| 332 | Plateau desert soil, Mojave, Los Angeles Co. | .28 | 12.50 | .035 |
| 2126 | Gravelly soil, East Highlands, | .62 | 11.75 | .070 |
| San Bernardino Co. | ||||
| 1910 | Ojai Valley soil, Nordhoff, Ventura Co. | 1.64 | 11.21 | .183 |
| 2187 | Sandy loam soil, Soledad, Monterey Co. | .97 | 11.10 | .110 |
| 1759 | Sandy soil, Perris Valley, Riverside Co. | .53 | 11.04 | .059 |
| 774 | Bench slope soil, Ontario, San Bernardino Co. | 1.29 | 10.85 | .140 |
| 1984 | Red soil, East Highlands “ ““ | .58 | 10.50 | .060 |
| 2325 | Silt soil of desert, Imperial, San Diego Co. | .65 | 10.70 | .070 |
| 1906 | Light sandy soil, Pomona, San Bernardino Co. | .95 | 9.80 | .093 |
| 2430 | Hillside adobe, Berkeley, Alameda Co. | 1.85 | 8.70 | .160 |
| Average of arid uplands | .91 | 15.23 | .135 | |
| Sub-irrigated Arid Soils (California). | ||||
| 586 | Sandy plains soil, Tulare, Tulare Co. | 1.14 | 10.79 | .123 |
| 1466 | Loam soil, Miramonte, Kern Co. | .60 | 10.66 | .064 |
| 1284 | Moist land loam soil, Chino, San Bernardino Co. | 1.99 | 10.20 | .203 |
| 1148 | Swale soil, near Paso Robles, | 1.16 | 9.65 | .112 |
| San Luis Obispo Co. | ||||
| 1714 | Bench soil, Santa Clara River, Piru, | .78 | 9.56 | .074 |
| Ventura Co. | ||||
| 77 | Alluvial soil, Tulare Lake bed, Tulare Co. | .47 | 9.37 | .045 |
| 1880 | Creek bench soil, Niles, Alameda Co. | 1.19 | 8.90 | .109 |
| 1903 | Sediment soil, Porterville, Tulare Co. | 1.12 | 8.50 | .140 |
| 168 | Alluvial soil, Santa Clara river, Santa Paula | .84 | 7.99 | .067 |
| Ventura Co. | ||||
| 1760 | Green-sage land, Perris Valley, Riverside Co. | .91 | 7.70 | .070 |
| 506 | Alluvial soil, Colorado River, Yuma, | .75 | 7.47 | .050 |
| San Diego Co. | ||||
| 1636 | Red soil, Manton, Tehama Co | 2.00 | 6.86 | .137 |
| 1758 | Alkali soil, Perris Valley, Riverside Co. | .60 | 6.83 | .071 |
| 1963 | Sandy loam soil, Willows, Glenn Co. | .36 | 6.05 | .022 |
| 2080 | Sandy soil, Santa Maria Valley, | 1.64 | 5.36 | .090 |
| Santa Barbara Co. | ||||
| Average of sub-irrigated arid soils | 1.06 | 8.38 | .099 | |
| Humid Soils From Arid and Humid Regions (California). | ||||
| 207 | Eel River Alluvial soil, Ferndale, Humboldt Co. | 1.25 | 6.96 | .085 |
| 2319 | Alluvial soil, Hupa Valley, Humboldt Co. | 7.83 | 6.70 | .514 |
| 213 | Marsh soil, Novato, Meadows, Marin Co. | 1.54 | 6.36 | .089 |
| 1704 | Valley soil, Hollister, San Benito Co. | .94 | 5.21 | .049 |
| 2295 | Tule soil, Upper Lake, Lake Co. | 1.70 | 4.50 | .077 |
| 110 | Alluvial soil, Putah Creek, Dixon, Solano Co. | 1.71 | 4.25 | .072 |
| 37 | Redwood Valley soil, Pescadero, San Mateo Co. | 2.28 | 3.07 | .070 |
| Average for California | 2.45 | 5.29 | .135 | |
| Other States. | ||||
| 26 | Bog soil, Michigan[52] | 33.02 | 6.08 | 2.012 |
| Back-land clay loam, Houma, Louisiana | 5.07 | 4.20 | .218 | |
| Duff soil, Oregon | 13.84 | 3.49 | .483 | |
| Sandy prairie soil, Harris Co., Texas | 2.13 | 3.66 | .184 | |
| Average for other States | 7.01 | 3.78 | .295 | |
| 23 | Red soil, Oahu Island, Hawaii (maximum) | 1.57 | 5.07 | .078 |
| 27 | Guava soil, Hawaii Island (minimum) | 9.95 | 1.71 | .170 |
| Average of 5 soils, Oahu Island | 3.01 | 6.07 | .237 | |
| Average of 2 soils, Maui Island | 9.07 | 2.13 | .286 | |
| Average of 4 soils, Hawaii Island | 6.17 | 2.54 | .146 | |
| Average for Hawaiian Islands | 5.26 | 3.69 | .169 | |
| Total for Humid soils, average | 4.58 | 4.23 | .166 |
It thus appears that on the average the humus of the arid soils contains about three and a half times as much nitrogen as that of the humid; that in the extreme cases, the difference goes as high as over six to one (see Nos. 37 and 704); and that in the latter cases, the nitrogen-percentage in the arid humus considerably exceeds that of the albuminoid group, the flesh-forming substances.
It thus becomes intelligible that in the arid region a humus-percentage which under humid conditions would justly be considered entirely inadequate for the success of normal crops, may nevertheless suffice even for the more exacting ones. This is more clearly seen on inspection of the figures in the third column, which represent the product resulting from the multiplication of the humus-percentage of the soil into the nitrogen-percentage of its humus; as appears in comparing the respective averages, or Nos. 1167 and 110 and others. An additional consideration is the probable greater ease with which the nitrifying bacteria can act upon a material so rich in nitrogen.
We must not, then, be misled by the smallness of many humus-percentages in the arid region, into an assumption of a deficiency in the supply of soil-nitrogen.
Decrease of Nitrogen-Content in Humus with Depth.—Since the oxidation of the carbon and hydrogen in the humus-substance, and the consequent increase of its relative nitrogen-content, are manifestly dependent upon the presence of air and heat, it is reasonably to be expected that the nitrogen-percentage of the humus should decrease with the depth of the soil. That this is really the case is plainly shown in the subjoined table, which gives the humus-percentages and the nitrogen-content of the humus from the surface foot down to twelve feet, in a soil on the bench of the Russian River, Cal., which is sub-irrigated, and liable to more or less rainfall during the summer. It will be seen that not only does the absolute humus-percentage decrease quite regularly down to seven feet, at which point there evidently was at one time a strong root development, causing a notable increase of the humus-content; from which again there is a regular decrease down to the twelfth foot. It will be noted that the nitrogen-percentage in the humus, while not decreasing with the same regularity as the humus-content itself, yet exhibits a general recession from 5.30 to 1.15 in the ninth foot, to which direct oxidation doubtless never penetrates.
| HUMUS AND NITROGEN-CONTENT OF RUSSIAN RIVER SOIL. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth in feet. | Per cent Humus in soil. | Per cent Nitrogen in Humus. | Per cent Humus-Nitrogen. in soil. |
| 1 | 1.21 | 5.30 | .064 |
| 2 | 1.16 | 4.32 | .054 |
| 3 | 1.14 | 3.87 | .044 |
| 4 | 1.17 | 3.76 | .044 |
| 5 | .74 | 2.16 | .016 |
| 6 | .60 | 2.66 | .016 |
| 7 | .47 | 2.54 | .012 |
| 8 | .78 | 1.54 | .012 |
| 9 | .54 | 2.24 | .012 |
| 10 | .52 | 1.15 | .006 |
| 11 | .53 | 1.51 | .008 |
| 12 | .44 | 1.81 | .008 |
Influence of the Original Materials on the composition of Humus.—The great variability of the composition of humus formed from different substances is well shown in the subjoined table, representing the results of experiments made by Snyder,[53] who caused various substances to humify by mixing the pulverized material intimately with a soil poor in humus, and allowing the process to continue for a year. At the end of that time the humus formed was extracted by the method of Grandeau, outlined above, and analyzed, with the following results.
| Sugar. | Oat Straw. | Green Clover. | Wheat Flour. | Sawdust. | Meat Scraps. | Cow Manure.[54] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon | 57.84 | 54.30 | 54.22 | 51.02 | 49.28 | 48.77 | 41.93 |
| Hydrogen | 3.04 | 2.48 | 3.40 | 3.82 | 3.33 | 4.30 | 6.26 |
| Nitrogen | 0.08 | 2.50 | 8.24 | 5.02 | 0.32 | 10.96 | 6.16 |
| Oxygen | 39.04 | 40.72 | 34.14 | 40.14 | 47.07 | 35.97 | 45.63 |
| 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |