Total Yield
Green Forage
per acre
Dry Matter
per acre
Total Protein
per acre
PoundsPoundsPounds
Alfalfa36,5408,2582,214
Corn (entire plant)24,0005,040  408
Red clover14,0004,088  616
Barnyard millet16,0004,000  384
Crimson clover14,0002,674  434
Cowpeas16,0002,624  384
Oats and peas14,0002,107  363
Dry MatterTotal Protein
PoundsPounds
1 ton alfalfa hay contains1,809  265
1 ton red clover hay contains1,694  246
1 ton oats and peas contains1,375  175
1 ton timothy contains1,736  118
1 ton wheat bran contains1,762  308
1 ton wheat middlings contains1,758  312
1 ton rye bran contains1,768  294
1 ton oats contains1,780  236
1 ton rice meal contains1,796  240
1 ton buckwheat bran contains1,790  248

At the Colorado station (Bul. No. 26) Prof. W. W. Cooke compared an acre of dent (Golden Beauty) corn, planted May 16 and harvested September 21, with returns from an acre of alfalfa on an adjoining plat, three years seeded. The corn crop was a fair one, and including ears and stalks weighed 15,500 pounds, containing 35.62 per cent or 5539 pounds of dry matter. The alfalfa yielded three cuttings of hay weighing respectively 4600, 3350 and 3250 pounds, or 5.6 tons, containing 10,304 pounds of dry matter. But, as Professor Cooke says, this is not quite a fair comparison, for a pound of dry matter from the corn crop is more digestible and has a higher feeding value than an equal amount from the alfalfa. The corn crop contained 3605 pounds of digestible feeding material, while the alfalfa crop contained 5611 pounds, or a little more than half as much again. The corn crop per acre in feeding value was equivalent to three and a half tons of alfalfa hay.

The total digestible nutrients of the two crops are presented in the following table:

TOTALDIGESTIBLE
CornAlfalfaCornAlfalfa
PoundsPoundsPoundsPounds
Dry matter5,53910,3043,6055,611
Albuminoids  405 1,602  2961,198
Starch, sugar, etc.3,263 4,7822,1863,114
Fiber1,472 2,8001,0601,198
Fat (ether extract)   84   246   63  101
Ash  315   829........

COMPARATIVE VALUES OF ALFALFA HAY AND OTHER FEED STUFFS FOR PROTEIN

FeedstuffValue per ton when prairie hay
is worth per ton—
$2.00$3.00$4.00
Alfalfa hay (average)$6.05$9.08$12.11
Red clover hay3.885.827.77
Orchard-grass hay2.744.115.48
Millet hay2.573.855.14
Timothy hay1.652.483.31
Sorghum hay1.372.052.74
Corn-fodder (stover)1.141.712.28
Oat straw .911.371.82
Wheat straw .45 .68 .91
Sugar beets .62 .941.25
Mangel-wurzels .57 .851.14
Alfalfa hay containing 12.9 per cent digestible protein7.3611.0514.73
Wheat bran7.0210.5314.04

It is seen that the alfalfa yielded nearly twice as many pounds of dry matter as the corn, with the digestible nutrients far in the lead, and the protein of the alfalfa was three times that of the corn.

THE BALANCED RATION

No feeder can learn to use alfalfa, or in fact any forage or grain, in the most economical way until he understands somewhat the compounding of a balanced ration. All foodstuffs for either man or beast are, as already stated, made up of three classes of substances—namely, protein or proteids, carbohydrates and fats. The animal’s digestive and assimilative organs are so constructed that it cannot use these three classes of substances interchangeably; in other words, an animal fed wholly upon any one of these three would be in process of gradual starvation. Given in the proportions needed to best supply the vital organs of the body, these substances become the sustenance for animal life and growth. The protein builds up the brain, nerves, muscles and other tissues in which the life force is active, and without protein there would be no life.

To balance a ration for domestic animals is to so adjust the quantity of digestible proteids, fats and carbohydrates it contains that the animal economy may use each without waste. The balanced ration means an economical ration, allowing the digestive organs to work at their highest efficiency; an unbalanced ration is one in which one of the three classes of food substances is in excess, or is deficient. Fed such a ration, the animal retaliates upon its owner by failure to digest the excess, which is worse than wasted; for the feeding of any class of substances in excess adds to the labor of the digestive organs and reduces their efficiency.