Accordingly a different policy was pursued in the later dissolutions. All the religious received payments and most received pensions.
At the suppression of Brewood,[205] Prioress Isabel Launder received a reward of £2 and a pension of £3 6s. 8d.; each of the nuns a reward of £1 and a pension of £1 13s. 4d. At Stafford[206] the payments were as follows:
| £ | s. | d. | £ | s. | d. | |||
| Richard Whytell, “late Prior” | 6 | 0 | 0 | reward, | 26 | 13 | 4 | pension |
| Richard Harvey, Sub-Prior | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 6 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Sir Christopher Simson | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 6 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Sir Thomas Bageley | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 6 | 8 | „ |
| Sir William Pykstok | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 6 | 8 | „ |
| Sir William Stapulton | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Sir William Boudon | 1 | 0 | 0 | „ |
No explanation is given as to why William Boudon received a smaller “reward” than the rest, and was awarded no pension; but, as we have already noticed, he had not signed the Deed of Surrender on the previous day and perhaps he had to be punished for his recalcitrancy.
At Dieulacres[207] the arrangements were of a similar nature:
| £ | s. | d. | £ | s. | d. | |||
| Thomas Whitney, Abbot | 6 | 0 | 0 | reward, | 60 | 0 | 0 | pension |
| Robert Bageley, Prior | 2 | 10 | 0 | „ | 60 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Henry Bennett | 2 | 10 | 0 | „ | 6 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| George Ferny | 2 | 10 | 0 | „ | ||||
| Brother Rauffe Motesset | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 6 | 8 | „ |
| Randall Barnes | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 6 | 8 | „ |
| Brother William Crosse | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 6 | 8 | „ |
| Brother Robert Cherinton | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 6 | 8 | „ |
| Brother Edmond Bolton | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Brother William Prowdluffe | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 5 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Thomas Loke | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| Brother Richard Gordon | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ |
| John Bykerton | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ | 2 | 0 | 0 | „ |
To George Ferny no pension was allotted. Pensions to “late monks” of Croxden, Rocester, Tutbury, and Burton are mentioned in subsequent records. In 1553 the payments to late monks of Tutbury appear as follows: Prior Thomas Meverell, £50; Thomas Moreton, alias Sutton, £7; Richard Arnold, £6 13s. 4d.; Thomas Raynard, £6; Robert Stafford, £6; Roger Hilton, £6.
In the pension lists of 2–3 Philip and Mary, Robert Moore, who had been one of the prebendaries of the collegiate church of Burton-on-Trent, appears in receipt of £6; John Carter, a “late canon,” £6; William Sutton, “minor canon,” £6; and William Hether, epistoller, £5; with Thomas Smith, incumbent of a chantry, £1 5s. 9d.
Monks of Burton who were in receipt of pensions in 1540 were as follows: John Pole, Robert Robynson, Robert Heithcott, William Fyssher, John Goodcole, William Symon, and Humphrey Cotton. Of these the following appear in the list of Mary’s reign above-mentioned: William Fyssher, £6; William Symonds, £5; and Humphrey Cotton, 40s. The following also had pensions then: Robert Brocke, alias Brooke (who succeeded Abbot Edie as Dean), £66 13s. 4d.; John Rudde, £15; Roger Bulle (? Ball) and John Jermy, alias Heron, £6 13s. 4d. There are “annuities” also to twenty-five others, two of £5, one of £4, one of £3 6s. 8d., two of 53s. 4d., one of 50s., and three of 40s., and so on to 20s., but none of the names are the same as appear in Valor Ecclesiasticus, though John Moseley (20s.) may be the son of Richard Mosley, bailiff of Findern and Stapenhill, who received 13s. 4d. in 1535.
Ecclesiastics who proved compliant were often well rewarded, as we have seen in the case of David Pole of Calwich. The Abbot of Burton became the dean of the collegiate church which took the place of the Abbey for a few years. At the suppression of Forde Abbey the Abbot, who had been the royal “Reformator and Inquisitor” of Croxden and many other Cistercian houses, received “fourtie wayne lodes of fyre wood to be taken yerely during his lyfe owte of suche woods being no parte of demaynes of the said late howse as the officers of the Kings courte of the augmentacions or there deputies for the tyme there shall appoynte and assigne ... lxxxli.”[208]