DESCRIPTION OF THE TABLES

PAGE
Summary of evidence in favour of finger marks being persistent[96]
Interpolation of ridges[104]
I.Percentage frequency of Arches, Loops, and Whorls on thedifferent digits, as observed in the 5000 digits of 500 different persons[115]
II.Distribution of the A. L. W. patterns on the corresponding digitsof the two hands[116]
III.Percentage frequency of Arches on the digits of the two hands[117]
IV.Percentage frequency of Loops on the digits of the two hands[118]
V.Percentage frequency of Whorls on the digits of the two hands[118]
VIa.Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occursin the same digits of the two hands[120]
VIb.Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occursin various couplets of different digits[120]
VII.Couplets of fingers of different names in the same and in the opposite hands[121]
VIII.Measures of relationship between the digits on a centesimal scale[129]
IX.Index to 100 sets of finger prints[133]
X.Number of different index-heads in 100 sets, according to the number of digits noted[136]
XI.Number of entries under the same heads in 100 sets[139]
XII.Index-headings under which more than 1 per cent of the sets were registered in 500 sets[140]
XIII.Percentage of entries falling under a single head in 100, 300, and 500 sets[141]
XIV.Number of different index-headings in 100 sets, according to the number of fingers in each set, and to the method of indexing[142]
XV.Number of entries in 500 sets, each of the fore, middle, and ring-fingers only[146]
XVI.Number of cases of various anthropometric datathat severally fell in the three classes of large, medium, and small, when certain
limiting values were adopted
[159]
XVII.Distribution of 500 sets of measures, each set consisting of five elements, into classes[160]
XVIII.Number of the above sets that fell under the same headings[161]
XIX.Further analysis of the two headings that contained the most numerous entries[162]
XX.Observed random couplets[174]
XXI.Calculated random couplets[174]
XXII.Observed fraternal couplets[175]
XXIII.Fraternal couplets—random, observed, and utmost feasible[176]
XXIV.Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets[181]
XXV.Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—random and observed[182]
XXVI.Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—resemblance measured on centesimal scale[182]
XXVII.Twins[186]
XXVIII.Children of like-patterned parents[188]
XXIX.Paternal and maternal influence[190]
XXX.Different races, percentage frequency of arches in fore-finger[194]
XXXI.Distribution of number of ridges in AH, and of other measures in loops[203]
XXXII.Ordinates to their schemes of distribution[204]
XXXIII.Comparison of the above with calculated values[205]
XXXIV.Proportions of a typical loop on the right and left thumbs respectively[209]

DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES

PAGE
I.—Fig. 1. Chinese coin with the symbol of the nail-mark of the Empress Wen-teh[25]
Fig. 2. Order on a camp sutler by Mr. Gilbert Thompson, who used his finger print for the same purpose as the scroll-work in cheques, viz. to ensure the detection of erasures[27]
II.—Fig. 3. Form of card used at my anthropometric laboratory for finger prints. It shows the places where they are severally impressed, whether dabbed or rolled ([p. 40]), and the hole by which they are secured in their box[145]
Fig. 4. Small printing roller, used in the pocket apparatus, actual size. It may be covered either with india-rubber tubing or with roller composition[40]
III.—Fig. 5. Diagram of the chief peculiarities of ridges, called here minutiæ (the scale is about eight times the natural size)[54]
Fig. 6. The systems of ridges and the creases in the palm, indicated respectively by continuous and by dotted lines. Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5 show variations in the boundaries of the systems of ridges, and places where smaller systems are sometimes interpolated[54]
IV.—Fig. 7. The effects of scars and cuts on the ridges: a is the result of a deep ulcer; b the finger of a tailor (temporarily) scarred by the needle; c the result of a deep cut[59]
Fig. 8. Formation of the interspace: filled in (3) by a loop; in (4) by a scroll. The triangular plot or plots are indicated. In (1) there is no interspace, but a succession of arches are formed, gradually flattening into straight lines[67]
V.—Fig. 9. Specimens of rolled thumb prints, of the natural size, in which the patterns have been outlined, [p. 69], and on which lines have been drawn for orientation and charting[68]
VI.—Fig. 10. Specimens of the outlines of the patterns on the ten digits of eight different persons, not selected but taken as they came. Its object is to give a general idea of the degree of their variety. The supply of ridges from the inner (or thumb side) are coloured blue, those from the outer are red (the scale is of the natural size)[70]
VII.—Fig. 11. Standard patterns of Arches, together with some transitional forms, all with their names below[75]
Fig. 12. As above, with respect to Loops[75]
VIII.—Fig. 13. As above, with respect to Whorls[75]
Fig. 14. Cores to Loops, which may consist either of single lines, here called rods, or of a recurved line or staple, while the ridges that immediately envelops them is called an envelope[76]
Fig. 15. Cores to Whorls[77]
IX.—Fig. 15. Transitional patterns, enlarged three times, between Arches and either Loops or Whorls[79]
X.—Fig. 16. Transitional patterns, as above, but between Loops and Whorls[79]
XI.—Fig. 17. Diagram showing the nine genera formed by the corresponding combinations of the two letters by which they are expressed, each being i, j, or o as the case may be. The first two diagrams are Arches, and not strictly patterns at all, but may with some justice be symbolised by jj[80]
Fig. 18. Ambiguities in minutiæ, showing that certain details in them are not to be trusted, while others are[92]
XII.—Fig. 19. The illustrations to Purkenje’s Commentatio. They are photo-lithographed from the original, which is not clearly printed[86]
XIII.—Fig. 20. Enlarged impressions of the same two fingers of V. H. Hd., first when a child of 2½, and subsequently when a boy of 15 years of age. The lower pair are interesting from containing the unique case of failure of exact coincidence yet observed. It is marked A. The numerals indicate the correspondences[92]
XIV.—Fig. 21. Contains portions on an enlarged scale of eight couplets of finger prints, the first print in each couplet having been taken many years before the second, as shown by the attached dates. The points of correspondence in each couplet are indicated by similar numerals[93]
XV.—Fig. 22. The fore-finger of Sir W. J. Herschel as printed on two occasions, many years apart (enlarged scale). The numerals are here inserted on a plan that has the merit of clearness, but some of the lineations are thereby sacrificed[95]
Fig. 23. Shows the periods of life over which the evidence of identity extends in Figs 20-22. [By an oversight, not perceived until too late for remedy, the bottom line begins at æt. 62 instead of 67][97]