An index to each set of finger marks made by the same person, is needful in almost every kind of inquiry, whether it be for descriptive purposes, for investigations into race and heredity, or into questions of symmetry and correlation. It is essential to possess an index to the finger marks of known criminals before the method of finger prints can be utilised as an organised means of detection.

The ideal index might be conceived to consist of a considerable number of compartments, or their equivalents, each bearing a different index-heading, into which the sets of finger prints of different persons may be severally sorted, so that all similar sets shall lie in the same compartment.

The principle of the proposed method of index-headings is, that they should depend upon a few conspicuous differences of pattern in many fingers, and not upon many minute differences in a few fingers. It is carried into effect by distinguishing the A. L. W. class of pattern on each digit in succession, by a letter,—a for Arch, l for Loop, w for Whorl; or else, as an alternative method, to subdivide l by using i for a loop with an Inner slope, and o for one with an Outer slope, as the case may be. In this way, the class of pattern in each set of ten digits is described by a sequence of ten letters, the various combinations of which are alphabetically arranged and form the different index-headings. Let us now discuss the best method of carrying out this principle, by collating the results of alternative methods of applying it. We have to consider the utility of the i and o as compared to the simple l, and the gain through taking all ten digits into account, instead of only some of them.

It will be instructive to print here an actual index to the finger prints of 100 different persons, who were not in any way selected, but taken as they came, and to use it as the basis of a considerable portion of the following remarks, to be checked where necessary, by results derived from an index to 500 cases, in which these hundred are included.

This index is compiled on the principle shortly to be explained, entitled the “i and o fore-finger” method.

Table IX.—Index to 100 Sets of Finger Prints.

Order
of
Entry.
A
Right.
B
Left.
C
Rt.
D
Lt.
F.M.R.F.M.R.T.L.T.L.
1a a aa a aa al a
2""a la l
3""""
4""w ll l
5a a la a la la l
6""l ll l
7""""
8"a a wl ll l
9"a l ll ll l
10""l ww l
11"o l ll ll l
12a a wa a ll ll l
13"a l ll ll l
14a l aa a al al a
15""l al w
16"o l lw ll l
17a l la a ll la l
18""l ll l
19""""
20""""
21""""
22""w ll l
23"a l wl ll l
24"i l ll ll l
25""""
26a l li l lw ll l
27"o a lw ll l
28"o l lw ll l
29"w w ww ll l
30a l wi l wl ll l
31"o a ll ll l
32"o l ll wl l
33""w lw l
34"o l wa la l
35i l la l lw ll l
36""w lw l
37"i l ll ll l
38""""
39""""
40""""
41i l li l lw ll l
42"i w ww lw l
43i l wi l ll lw l
44""w ww l
45"i l ww ww l
46"i w ll ll l
47"w l ww lw l
48"w w ll ll l
49i w wa l lw lw l
50"w w ww lw l
51""""
52o a wo l ll ll l
53o l lo l ll ll l
54""""
55""""
56""w lw l
57"i l ll ll l
58""""
59""""
60"o l ll ll l
61""""
62""""
63""""
64""""
65""""
66"w a ll lw l
67"w w wl lw l
68o l wa l ll ll l
69""w lw l
70"i l lw lw l
71"o l ll ll l
72""""
73"o l wl ll l
74""""
75w l li l ll lw l
76""""
77w l lw l ll ll l
78""""
79""w lw l
80"w l wl ll l
81w l wo l wl ll l
82""l la l
83""w ll l
84"w w ww lw l
85""w wl l
86""w wl w
87""w ww w
88""""
89w w li l ll ll l
90"w l lw ll l
91w w wo l ww ll l
92"w l ww lw l
93""""
94"w w ll ll w
95"w w wi ll l
96""w ll l
97""w lw l
98""w ww l
99""""
100""w ww w

The sequence in which the digits have been registered is not from the thumb outwards to the little finger, but, on account of various good reasons that will be appreciated as we proceed, in the following order.

The ten digits are registered in four groups, which are distinguished in the Index by the letters A, B, C, D:—