| TABLE OF CONTENTS. | ||
|---|---|---|
| PAGE | ||
| Preface | [i] | |
| Introduction | [1] | |
| 1872 | ||
| I. | On some points in theGeology of the East Lothian Coast. By G. W. and F. M.Balfour | [25] |
| 1873 | ||
| II. | The development and growthof the layers of the blastoderm. With Plate 1 | [29] |
| III. | On the disappearance ofthe Primitive Groove in the Embryo Chick. With Plate 1 | [41] |
| IV. | The development of theblood-vessels of the Chick. With Plate 2 | [47] |
| 1874 | ||
| V. | A preliminary account of thedevelopment of the Elasmobranch Fishes. With Plates 3 and 4 | [60] |
| 1875 | ||
| VI. | A comparison of the earlystages in the development of Vertebrates. With Plate 5 | [112] |
| VII. | On the origin and historyof the urinogenital organs of Vertebrates | [135] |
| VIII. | On the development of thespinal nerves in Elasmobranch Fishes. With Plates 22 and 23 | [168] |
| 1876 | ||
| IX. | On the spinal nerves ofAmphioxus | [197] |
| 1876-78 | ||
| X. | A Monograph on thedevelopment of Elasmobranch Fishes. With Plates 6-21 | [203] |
| 1878 | ||
| XI. | On the phenomenaaccompanying the maturation and impregnation of the ovum | [521] |
| XII. | On the structure anddevelopment of the vertebrate ovary. With Plates 24, 25, 26 | [549] |
| 1879 | ||
| XIII. | On the existence of aHead-kidney in the Embryo Chick, and on certain points in the developmentof the Müllerian duct. By F. M. Balfour and A. Sedgwick. With Plates 27 and 28 | [618] |
| XIV. | On the early developmentof the Lacertilia, together with some observations on the nature andrelations of the primitive Streak. With Plate 29 | [644] |
| XV. | On certain points in theAnatomy of Peripatus Capensis | [657] |
| XVI. | On the morphology andsystematic position of the Spongida | [661] |
| 1880 | ||
| XVII. | Notes on the developmentof the Araneina. With Plates 30, 31, 32 | [668] |
| XVIII. | On the spinal nerves ofAmphioxus | [696] |
| XIX. | Address to the Departmentof Anatomy and Physiology of the British Association for the Advancement ofScience | [698] |
| 1881 | ||
| XX. | On the development of theskeleton of the paired fins of Elasmobranchii, considered in relation toits bearings on the nature of the limbs of the Vertebrata. With Plate33 | [714] |
| XXI. | On the evolution of thePlacenta, and on the possibility of employing the characters of thePlacenta in the classification of the Mammalia | [734] |
| 1882 | ||
| XXII. | On the structure anddevelopment of Lepidosteus. By F. M. Balfour andW. N. Parker. With Plates 34-42 | [738] |
| XXIII. | On the nature of theorgan in Adult Teleosteans and Ganoids which is usually regarded as theHead-kidney or Pronephros | [848] |
| XXIV. | A renewed study of thegerminal layers of the Chick. By F. M. Balfour andF. Deighton. With Plates 43, 44, 45 | [854] |
| Posthumous,1883 | ||
| XXV. | The Anatomy andDevelopment of Peripatus Capensis. Edited by H. N.Moseley and A. Sedgwick. With Plates46-53 | [871] |
Francis Maitland Balfour, the sixth child and third son of James Maitland Balfour of Whittinghame, East Lothian, and Lady Blanche, daughter of the second Marquis of Salisbury, was born at Edinburgh, during a temporary stay of his parents there, on the 10th November, 1851. He can hardly be said to have known his father, who died of consumption in 1856, at the early age of thirty-six, and who spent the greater part of the last two years of his life at Madeira, separated from the younger children who remained at home. He fancied at one time that he had inherited his father's constitution; and this idea seems to have spurred him on to achieve early what he had to do. But, though there was a period soon after he went to College, during which he seemed delicate, and the state of his health caused considerable anxiety to his friends, he eventually became fairly robust, and that in spite of labours which greatly taxed his strength.
The early years of his life were spent chiefly at Whittinghame under the loving care of his mother. She made it a point to attempt to cultivate in all her children some taste for natural science, especially for natural history, and in this she was greatly helped by the boys' tutor, Mr J. W. Kitto. They were encouraged to make collections and to form a museum, and the fossils found in the gravel spread in front of the house served as the nucleus of a geological series. Frank soon became greatly interested in these things, and indeed they may be said to have formed the beginnings of his scientific career. At all events there was thus awakened in him a love for geology, which science continued to be his favorite study all through his boyhood, and interested him to the last. He was most assiduous in searching for fossils in the gravel and elsewhere, and so great was his love for his collections that while as yet quite a little boy the most delightful birthday present he could think of was a box with trays and divisions to hold his fossils and specimens. His mother, thinking that his fondness for fossils was a passing fancy and that he might soon regret the purchase of the box, purposely delayed the present. But he remained constant to his wish and in time received his box. He must at this time have been about seven or eight years old. In the children's museum, which has been preserved, there are specimens labelled with his childish round-hand, such as a piece of stone with the label “marks of some shels;” and his sister Alice, who was at that time his chief companion, remembers discussing with him one day after the nursery dinner, when he was about nine years old, whether it were better to be a geologist or a naturalist, he deciding for the former on the ground that it was better to do one thing thoroughly than to attempt many branches of science and do them imperfectly.
Besides fossils, he collected not only butterflies, as do most boys at some time or other, but also birds; and he with his sister Alice, being instructed in the art of preparing and preserving skins, succeeded in making a very considerable collection. He thus acquired before long not only a very large but a very exact knowledge of British birds.
In the more ordinary work of the school-room he was somewhat backward. This may have been partly due to the great difficulty he had in learning to write, for he was not only left-handed but, in his early years, singularly inapt in acquiring particular muscular movements, learning to dance being a great trouble to him. Probably however the chief reason was that he failed to find any interest in the ordinary school studies. He fancied that the family thought him stupid, but this does not appear to have been the case.
In character he was at this time quick tempered, sometimes even violent, and the energy which he shewed in after life even thus early manifested itself as perseverance, which, when he was crossed, often took on the form of obstinacy, causing at times no little trouble to his nurses and tutors. But he was at the same time warm-hearted and affectionate; full of strong impulses, he disliked heartily and loved much, and in his affections was wonderfully unselfish, wholly forgetting himself in his thought for others, and ready to do things which he disliked to please those whom he loved. Though, as we have said, somewhat clumsy, he was nevertheless active and courageous; in learning to ride he shewed no signs of fear, and boldly put his pony to every jump which was practicable.
In 1861 he was sent to the Rev. C. G. Chittenden's preparatory school at Hoddesden in Hertfordshire, and here the qualities which had been already visible at home became still more obvious. He found difficulty not only in writing but also in spelling, and in the ordinary school-work he took but little interest and made but little progress.
In 1865 he was moved to Harrow and placed in the house of the Rev. F. Rendall. Here, as at Hoddesden, he did not show any great ability in the ordinary school studies, though as he grew older his progress became more marked. But happily he found at Harrow an opportunity for cultivating that love of scientific studies which was yearly growing stronger in him. Under the care of one of the Masters, Mr G. Griffith, the boys at Harrow were even then taught the elements of natural science. The lessons were at that time, so to speak, extra-academical, carried on out of school hours; nevertheless, many of the boys worked at them with diligence and even enthusiasm, and among these Balfour became conspicuous, not only by his zeal but by his ability. Griffith was soon able to recognize the power of his new pupil, and thus early began to see that the pale, earnest, somewhat clumsy-handed lad, though he gave no promise of being a scholar in the narrower sense of the word, had in him the makings of a man of science. Griffith chiefly confined his teaching to elementary physics and chemistry with some little geology, but he also encouraged natural history studies and began the formation of a museum of comparative anatomy. Balfour soon began to be very zealous in dissecting animals, and was especially delighted when the Rev. A. C. Eaton, the well-known entomologist, on a visit to Harrow, initiated Griffith's pupils in the art of dissecting under water. The dissection of a caterpillar in this way was probably an epoch in Balfour's life. Up to that time his rough examination of such bodies had revealed to him nothing more than what in school-boy language he spoke of as “squash;” but when under Eaton's deft hands the intricate organs of the larval Arthropod floated out under water and displayed themselves as a labyrinth of threads and sheets of silvery whiteness a new world of observation opened itself up to Balfour, and we may probably date from this the beginning of his exact morphological knowledge.
While thus learning the art of observing, he was at the same time developing his power of thinking. He was by nature fond of argument, and defended with earnestness any opinions which he had been led to adopt. He was very active in the Harrow Scientific Society, reading papers, taking part in the discussions, and exhibiting specimens. He gained in 1867 a prize for an essay on coal, and when, in 1868, Mr Leaf offered a prize (a microscope) “for the best account of some locality visited by the writer during the Easter Holidays,” two essays sent in, one by Balfour, the other by his close friend, Mr Arthur Evans, since well known for his researches in Illyria, were found to be of such unusual merit that Prof. Huxley was specially requested to adjudicate between them. He judged them to be of equal merit, and a prize was given to each. The subject of Balfour's essay was “The Geology and Natural History of East Lothian.” When biological subjects were discussed at the Scientific Society, Balfour appears to have spoken as a most uncompromising opponent of the views of Mr Charles Darwin, little thinking that in after life his chief work would be to develop and illustrate the doctrine of evolution.