[163]. See “Rebates” and “Discriminations” in index to Hearings of the Elkins Committee, 1905.
Some of these witnesses who do not know of any discriminations or unreasonable rates declare in other parts of their testimony that if the proposed legislation were enacted the Interstate Commission would be deluged with complaints. And this is probably true, since complaints of excessive rates and discriminations have been more numerous in the last two or three years than in any other equal period before. (Testimony of Judge Clements of the I. C. C., Senate Committee, 1905, p. 3242.)
[164]. Sen. Com. 1905, p. 1331.
[165]. Ibid., pp. 2253, 2284.
[166]. Ibid., p. 3140.
[167]. Ibid., p. 1652.
[168]. On the question whether or no rebates and discriminations exist, the testimony of credible witnesses who say they know of these secret favors far outweighs the proving power of the negative statements of witnesses who say they do not know of the said phenomena. Lots of people did not know till recently that the Equitable paid a famous railroad senator $20,000 a year for “advice.” And the statements of a multitude that they did not know of it would weigh nothing against the testimony of 2 or 3 well informed men who positively stated the facts. Discriminations may go on without the railroad directors or principal officers knowing about them. They may not know about them on purpose. Where ignorance is protection ’tis folly to be wise.
Railway men have told me that in many cases leading officers of a railroad are purposely kept, or keep themselves, in perfect ignorance of all discriminations and other wrongdoing in order that such officers may appear in legislative and interstate commerce hearings without knowledge of any facts that would be prejudicial to the railroad.
[169]. Sen. Com. 1905, p. 1474.
[170]. Sen. Com. 1905, pp. 819, 820, 842.