| Funnels. | ||
| Shikishima | 3 | |
| Hatsuse | 3 | |
| Asahi | 2 | |
| Mikasa | 2 |
Little differences in rig have been purposely introduced; thus the Hatsuse is shorter-masted than the Shikishima, and the Asahi and Mikasa have their funnels differently placed, those of the latter being more amidships.
Also, instead of casemates, the Mikasa has her 6-in. battery protected by a continuous armoured wall. Essentially, however, the ships are sisters.
They were produced as follows:—
| Shikishima, | by | Thames Ironworks, | launched | 1898. |
| Asahi, | ” | Clydebank, | ” | 1899. |
| Hatsuse, | ” | Elswick, | ” | 1899. |
| Mikasa, | ” | Vickers-Maxim, | ” | 1900. |
Although she differs considerably from the Shikishima in appearance, the Asahi is practically a sister ship, the sole points of difference being (1) funnels; (2) distribution of the 2½-pounders; (3) absence of a bow torpedo boat; and (4) mounting of the big guns. There are, of course, certain minor structural differences—such, for instance, as the fact that the Asahi has a slightly larger wardroom, and that this wardroom is a trifle further aft—but, generally speaking, for fighting purposes they are identical, save for the points of difference noted above. There are unseen differences of detail also, such as the thickness of the armour deck, but none of these affect the fighting value. There is a difference, too, in the coal carried, but coal capacity does not show to the eye.
The details of the Asahi, with those of the Shikishima and the British Formidable, are as follows:—
PLAN OF MIKASA.