The Action of Medicines in the System / Or, on the mode in which therapeutic agents introduced into the stomach produce their peculiar effects on the animal economy

by Frederick William Headland

This proves at least that contact with the mucous surface is not an essential requisite for the operation of a remedy. We may cause a medicine to be absorbed by the skin, or inject it directly into an opened vein. The result of this latter experiment proves not only that entry into a distant part of the system is sufficient for the action of a medicine, but that it will operate when introduced into the blood. Numberless proofs of this affirmation may be adduced. Tartar Emetic injected into the veins produces vomiting. Croton Oil rubbed on the surface of the abdomen causes purging. Mercurial ointment applied by friction to the skin will produce salivation. Extract of Belladonna applied to the temples causes dilatation of the pupil of the eye; and tincture of Opium dropped on the eyeball causes the pupil to contract. Ammonia inhaled as gas into the lungs will relieve fainting in the same way as when swallowed. The breathing of Prussic acid, causing its vapour to be applied to the pulmonary surface, is sufficient to kill. Prussic acid, dropped in a concentrated state into the eye of a dog, causes speedy death. Solution of Aconitina, applied to the skin, will produce numbness, and tingling of distant parts. Injection of Nux Vomica, or any powerful poison, into the veins, is rapidly followed by symptoms of poisoning, like those which would have followed its introduction into the stomach.[17] Thus contact with the stomach is not necessary, but introduction into the system any where is sufficient. But still, may not the poison in either case act by influencing the nerves? Even when it has entered the blood, it may not travel along in it, but act in a more direct way. So in the second part of the proof we must show that a remedy cannot act by an impression conducted from the surface of the stomach by means of the nerves.

The continuity of nerve is not necessary for the propagation of such effects; but vascular connexion is necessary.

This alone, if established, would be sufficient to prove that a medicine must be introduced into the circulation, in order to act on distant parts. When confined to a surface, it can operate on the remote part only by its contact with the superficial extremities of the nerves. For vascular connexion to be established, it must first enter the vessels. Many experiments have been made which demonstrate that the vessels are the only channel by which medicinal effects can be propagated.

M. Magendie introduced some Woorara poison into the limb of a dog, which was only connected with the trunk by means of quills uniting the divided ends of the main vessels. It rapidly took effect. Having divided all the nerves and lymphatics in the intestine of another dog, he introduced into it some Nux Vomica, beyond the division. It quickly acted, and must again have done so through the vessels. Sir B. Brodie cut all the nerves of the anterior extremity of a rabbit, near the axilla, and then introduced Woorara into the foot. It rapidly acted.[18] Thus we see that vascular connexion is sufficient, and that nervous connexion is not necessary. By other similar trials it is found that vascular connexion is absolutely necessary, for when it is interrupted, the action cannot be propagated along a nerve. If, on introducing poison into an extremity, a cord be tightened round the limb above it so as to intercept the flow of blood, no effect is produced. It takes effect after the ligature is relaxed. Sir B. Brodie introduced Woorara into the leg of a dog, which was connected with the trunk only by means of the principal nerve, carefully dissected out. No effect followed. M. Ehbert found that poison would not act when applied to an amputated limb connected with the trunk by a nerve only. Thus vascular connexion is necessary; whereas continuity of nerve is not necessary, neither is it sufficient by itself.[19] Woorara poison is a substance which acts with great rapidity on the nervous system; and if its action cannot be propagated by means of the nerves, à fortiori would it seem that slower poisons must act through the circulation. But, granting that it has been shown that introduction into the stomach is not necessary for the action of a medicine, and that when in the stomach medicines do not act by influencing the nerves, still it may be objected that the rule cannot possibly be universal. It may be urged that some poisons and medicines, as Hydrocyanic acid and Ammonia, act with such great rapidity, that we can only suppose their influence to be transmitted directly along a nerve-fibre to the nervous centre, because the process of passage in the blood to this distant part would be far too slow. This argument requires us to prove a third thing.

The circulation of the blood is sufficiently quick to account even for the operation of those poisons which act most rapidly by influencing the nerve-centres.

There is no poison whatever which acts so quickly on distant parts that the circulation cannot previously have had time to conduct it to them. By means of an instrument invented by M. Poisseuille, Dr. Blake found that a chemical substance traversed the whole circulation of a dog in nine seconds, and of a horse in twenty seconds.[20] The results of Hering were similar. M. Volkmann, in the tenth chapter of his work on Hæmadynamics, states, as the result of several experiments, that the whole circulation in an adult man occupies exactly 65.76 seconds.

Now a poison that operated by nervous connexion would probably operate directly when it touched the stomach. This is not the case even with Hydrocyanic acid. This, the most sudden of all poisons, before it takes effect, allows sufficient time to elapse for the blood to conduct it to the brain. Blake made an interesting experiment upon it. He placed some on the tongue of a dog, having first fitted a tube into the larynx, so as to prevent the vapour from passing into the lungs. The effect did not commence until sixteen seconds had elapsed, and forty-five were required for its completion. This allowed of time for absorption.

Thus it is proved that poisons act when introduced into the system at any point; that vascular connexion is required for this action; and that the rapidity of the circulation is in all cases quick enough to account for it.

But this last is only a proof of possibility, and does not by itself show that a substance may not nevertheless act through the nerves. And to the experiments on nervous connexion some may object that no conclusions on this point can be drawn from trials made on isolated and exposed nerves. So we may imagine a person to be still incredulous as to the truth of the Proposition, that medicines must pass into the blood before they can act. But a fourth consideration will suffice to bring this probability as close as possible to a certainty.