Man and the Glacial Period

by G. Frederick Wright

Up to this time the above are all the instances in which the relics of man are directly and indubitably connected with deposits of this particular period east of the Rocky Mountains. Probably it is incorrect to speak of these as preglacial, for the portion of the period at which the deposits incorporating human relics were made is well on towards the close of the great Ice age, since these terraces were, in some cases, and may have been in all cases, deposited after the ice-front had withdrawn nearly, if not quite, to the water-shed of the St Lawrence basin. It may be difficult to demonstrate this with reference to the gravel deposits at Trenton, Madisonville, and Medora, but it is evident at a glance in the case of Newcomerstown and Little Falls.

That the implement-bearing gravel of Trenton, N. J., belongs to the later stages of the Glacial period is evident from its relation to what Professor H. Carvill Lewis called “the Philadelphia red gravel and brick-clay,” but which, from its large development in the District of Columbia at Washington, is called by Mr. McGee the “Columbia deposit.” The city of Philadelphia is built upon this formation in the Delaware Valley, and the brick for its houses is obtained from it; the cellar of each house ordinarily furnishing clay enough for its brick walls. This clay is of course a deposit in comparatively still water, which would imply deposition during a period of land subsidence. But that it was ice-laden water which flooded the banks is shown by the frequent occurrence of large blocks of stone in the deposits, such as could have been transported only in connection with floating ice. The boulders in the Columbia formation clearly belong to the individual river valleys in which they are found, and doubtless are to be connected with the flooded condition of those valleys when, by means of a northerly subsidence, the gradient of the streams was considerably less than now.

Fig. 74.—Quartz implement, found by Miss F. E. Babbitt, 1878, at Little Falls, Minnesota, in modified drift, fifteen feet below surface: a, face view; b, profile view. The black represented on the cut is the matrix of the quartz vein (No. 31,323) (Putnam).

There is some difference of opinion in respect to the extent of this subsidence, and, indeed, respecting the height attained by the Philadelphia brick-clay, or McGee’s Columbia deposit. Professor Lewis (whose residence was at Philadelphia, and who had devoted much time to field observations) insisted that the deposit could not be found higher than from 180 to 200 feet above the immediate flood-plain of the river valleys where they occur. But, without entering upon this disputed question, it is sufficient to consider the bearing of the facts that are accepted by all—namely, that towards the close of the Glacial period there was a marked subsidence of the land on the eastern coast of North America, increasing towards the north.

Fully to comprehend the situation, we need to bring before the mind some of the indirect effects of the Glacial period in this region. The most important of these was the necessary projection of subglacial conditions over a considerable belt of territory to the south of that actually reached by glacial ice; so that, while there are no clear indications of the existence of local glaciers in the Appalachian Mountains south of the central part of Pennsylvania, there are many indications of increased snow-fall upon the mountains, connected with prolonged winters and with a great increase of spring floods and ice-gorges upon the annual breaking up of winter.

These facts have been stated in detail by Mr. McGee,[CV] from whose report it appears that, on the Potomac at Washington, the surface of the Columbia deposit is 150 feet above tide, and that the deposit itself contains many boulders, some of which are as much as two or three feet in diameter. These are mingled with the gravel in such a way as to show that they must have been brought down by floating ice from the head-waters of the Potomac when the winters were much more severe than now. That this deposit is properly the work of the river is shown by the entire absence of marine shells.

[CV] Seventh Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey for 1885 and 1886, pp. 537-646.