“So what I feel is this: Here is the great divine creation I was taught to believe in. I can understand your disbelieving in it, but why disbelieve in a part of it? It was all one thing to me. God had authority because he was God. Man had authority because he was man. You cannot prove that God is better than a man; nor can you prove that a man is better than a horse. Why permit any ordinary thing? Why do you let a horse be saddled?”
“Some modern thinkers disapprove of it,” said Turnbull a little doubtfully.
“I know,” said MacIan grimly; “that man who talked about love, for instance.”
Turnbull made a humorous grimace; then he said: “We seem to be talking in a kind of shorthand; but I won't pretend not to understand you. What you mean is this: that you learnt about all your saints and angels at the same time as you learnt about common morality, from the same people, in the same way. And you mean to say that if one may be disputed, so may the other. Well, let that pass for the moment. But let me ask you a question in turn. Did not this system of yours, which you swallowed whole, contain all sorts of things that were merely local, the respect for the chief of your clan, or such things; the village ghost, the family feud, or what not? Did you not take in those things, too, along with your theology?”
MacIan stared along the dim village road, down which the last straggler from the inn was trailing his way.
“What you say is not unreasonable,” he said. “But it is not quite true. The distinction between the chief and us did exist; but it was never anything like the distinction between the human and the divine, or the human and the animal. It was more like the distinction between one animal and another. But——”
“Well?” said Turnbull.
MacIan was silent.
“Go on,” repeated Turnbull; “what's the matter with you? What are you staring at?”
“I am staring,” said MacIan at last, “at that which shall judge us both.”