“Let me tell you about this bay or gulf,” I said, tapping the photograph to recall her from her reverie. “You observe that it terminates at each end with a promontory. That at the western end is named Laplace, and the other Heraclides. The latter is the more picturesque. If ever you have an opportunity to see the moon with a good telescope do not fail to look at the promontory of Heraclides, for if you are fortunate in the choice of the time of observation when the setting sun is throwing its shadow over the adjoining ‘bay,’ you will find that the serrated outlines of the promontory represent, in a very striking manner, the profile of a woman, more sharply defined than the face of our familiar Moon Maiden, but a mere miniature in relative size. The shores of the Sinus Iridum are bordered with high cliffs, behind which rise the peaks of a mighty mountain mass. Just back of the center of the great bowed shore of the ‘bay’ appears, in the photograph, a small, bright crater ring. This bears the name of Bianchini. It is a lunar volcano, 18 miles in diameter, rising out of the midst of many ranges of nearly parallel hills and mountains, the general direction of which corresponds with that of the shore of the ‘bay.’ If there is any place on the moon where one is tempted to think that the scenes of a living world might once have been witnessed it is the Sinus Iridum and its neighborhood. Its latitude is between 40° and 50° north, corresponding with the most thickly populated zone of our own globe. The surface of the ‘bay’—once its bottom, if we admit that it was ever filled with water—is gently undulating, with winding ridges that suggest the action of tides and currents in sweeping to and fro deposits of sand and gravel, and piling them in long rows of bars and shallows. One can hardly help picturing in the mind’s eye waves breaking on the curving beach and dashing against the projecting rocks of the promontories; a white city seated just at the center of the shore of the ‘bay,’ near Bianchini, like Naples at the feet of Vesuvius; a rich vegetation covering the slopes of the mountain valleys, and romantic sails dotting the ‘bay’ and the neighboring ‘sea.’”
“I am very glad to observe,” interrupted my friend, “that you are not hopelessly prejudiced against my opinion that the moon has not always been ‘dead,’ as you call it.”
“I am so far from it,” I replied, “that I am half disposed to admit that she is not altogether dead even yet. But it is my duty to keep you as close as possible to the known facts. We shall see the Mare Imbrium and the neighborhood of the ‘Bay of Rainbows’ again. Meanwhile, suppose we turn to the next photograph of the series, No. 11. The age of the moon here is about thirteen days. She is fast approaching the phase of Full Moon. The first thing to which I would direct your attention now is the exceedingly brilliant point of light which has come into view near the terminator, a little north of east where the Mare Imbrium merges into the Oceanus Procellarum. In several ways this is the most noteworthy object on the moon. It led the famous English astronomer, Sir William Herschel, to believe that he had seen an active volcano on our satellite. He naïvely wrote in his notebook on a certain occasion: ‘The volcano glows more brightly to-night!’ Yet it is no more active than the other craters and crater rings in the lunar world. It is only extraordinarily, almost incredibly brilliant—by far the most dazzling point on the moon. It is a ring mountain, and is named Aristarchus. It has a near neighbor, barely visible in this photograph, close by toward the east named Herodotus. Herodotus is by no means remarkable for brilliancy. The central peak and a part of the floor and the east wall of Aristarchus consist of some material—nobody can tell what it is—which gleams in the sunlight, I had almost said like diamonds, although that would be an exaggeration. There are three or four other crater rings on the moon, including Proclus, which are also very brilliant, but not one of them can be regarded as a rival of Aristarchus. Its power of reflection is so great that it is even visible with a telescope in the lunar night, when the only light of any consequence that reaches it is that sent from the earth. It was, indeed, this fact which misled Herschel. He saw Aristarchus shining on the night side of the moon, and naturally thought that only the fires of an active volcano could have rendered it thus visible.”
No. 11. December 1, 1903; Moon’s Age 12.98 Days.
“And are you sure that he was mistaken?”
“Positively. There is no fire in Aristarchus, and has been none for ages.”
“But why do not astronomers undertake to find out what it is that makes Aristarchus so brilliant, then?”
“They have almost no data to go upon. You should be informed that even the greatest telescopes, with their highest powers, are unable to bring the moon within less than an apparent distance of say forty miles. At such a distance it is manifestly impossible to tell of what a lunar formation consists. We cannot analyze the moon with the spectroscope as we can the sun and the stars, because she does not shine with her own inherent light. We can only infer that a large part of the substance of Aristarchus consists of something which reflects a very great proportion of the light that falls upon it. If a mountain on the earth were composed of a vast mass of crystals, or of bare polished metal, we might expect it to present, when seen from the moon, some such appearance as we notice when we look at Aristarchus.
“In this photograph the Sinus Iridum, having the sun higher above it, is more brilliantly illuminated than in No. 10. Particularly you will notice the brightness of the line of cliffs along its eastern curve, terminating at the promontory of Heraclides.”