“I cannot tell you. But I certainly should not expect to find manlike creatures there.”
“Oh, men are not necessary everywhere,” said my friend, laughing. “I am content if you admit that there may be living creatures of some kind. Henceforth I shall never forget Plato and the other places on the moon where such significant changes are seen.”
“I shall presently point out to you one of the most notable of those other places,” I replied. “Let me now fulfill my promise to tell you more about the lunar atmosphere. I have told you already that there are strong reasons for supposing that the moon once had a far more dense atmosphere than she possesses at present, and I have mentioned some of the ways in which this atmosphere is supposed to have disappeared. I think that it is worth our while to refer to them again. In the first place the moon’s atmosphere may have been withdrawn into vast internal cavities formed by the gigantic volcanic eruptions. Secondly, it may have been absorbed both mechanically and chemically by the core of the moon as it cooled off. We know that cooling rocks absorb immense quantities of the gases constituting the air we breathe. In fact we may look forward to a time, fortunately for us extremely remote, when the interior rocks of the earth will, in this manner, absorb perhaps all of its atmosphere.”
“But if the air of the moon has gone into great cavities in the interior, why might not the living beings of the moon have followed it there?”
“According to some of the theorists,” I answered, “that may really be what has occurred, and thus the moon has become a ‘cavern world’ on a gigantic scale. But science does not regard seriously these speculations about ‘cave life’ in the moon. A third hypothesis is that which I have mentioned concerning the escape of the atmospheric gases from the moon on account of its attraction being insufficient permanently to retain them. This process would be gradual, because the molecules of a gas fly in all directions, only a small proportion having their trajectories directly away from the center of the globe on which they are held. But a singular consequence of this theory is that interplanetary space must contain an enormous number of such wandering molecules, and every attracting body must draw more or less of them to its surface, thus forming an atmosphere for itself. As Professor Young has remarked, if as many of these molecules enter a planet’s atmosphere in a day as escape from it there can be no decrease of the total amount of air. If more escape than enter, the atmosphere will diminish. If more enter than escape, the atmosphere will grow. Finally if none escape the atmosphere may increase indefinitely. This, as far as the effect of gravitation is concerned, should be the case on the sun, for the solar attraction is more than sufficient to retain any gas known to us. In consequence, the sun’s atmosphere may be increasing in extent and density. Even the earth’s atmosphere may be slowly increasing from this cause, and herein may lie the explanation of the enormous atmosphere surrounding the great planet Jupiter.
“In view of what I have said it is evident that the moon cannot be entirely airless. Recent observations have confirmed this conclusion, and some observers have thought that they could detect the presence of something resembling clouds occasionally creeping like low fogs over certain places on the moon. All this, you will observe, has an important bearing upon the question of life on the moon at the present day. Certain forms of plant life and low animal organizations might exist in such an atmosphere as the moon still possesses.”
“But,” interjected my friend, “is not this that you have been telling me in contradiction to what you said about the cause of the sharp division between day and night on the moon, and about the visibility of the stars there in the daytime?”
“Not at all,” I replied, “for the effects of which I spoke are relative. In any case the atmosphere of the moon must be too rare to diffuse any perceptible amount of light into the shadows, or to illuminate the sky sufficiently to render the stars invisible. The same reasoning applies to what I have told you about the contrasts of cold and heat on the moon.
“But we have not yet finished with our photograph. We were looking at the plain of Plato, you will recollect. Notice, now, the Mare Imbrium off the coast that adjoins Plato on the south. You see there several bright spots resembling islands. Islands they must have been if the mare once had water covering it. One of these, standing by itself, an irregular, bright clump with a distinct shadow on the western side, bears the name of Pico, taken from the sharp peak in the Azores Islands. The broken mass southeast of Pico, and nearer the coast, constitutes the Teneriffe Mountains. You will notice that terrestrial geography has been drawn upon in this case also to supply a name. Still farther east is a long ‘island’ named the Straight Range. Beyond that, at the edge of the picture, appears Cape Laplace, at the western end of the ‘Bay of Rainbows.’
“We now turn to the southwestern border of the Mare Imbrium, in the upper part of the photograph. This, as I have already pointed out, is skirted by the steep cliffs of the Apennines for a distance of more than 400 miles. Opposite the crater ring Marco Polo, in the Apennines, you will notice how the floor of the ‘sea’ is upheaved, containing a great number of irregularities, and some small peaks. This would have been a dangerous part of the ‘Sea of Rains’ for the lunar navigators. At the northwestern corner of this region lies a large ring plain, with indefinite light stripes crossing its floor, which is named Archimedes. It is about 50 miles in diameter. Northwest of it are two smaller ring mountains, Aristillus (the larger) and Autolycus. If we could suppose these immense volcanoes to have been in eruption when these seas were navigable, imagine the magnificent spectacle that they would have presented to anyone approaching in a ship from the direction of the strait between the Apennines and the Caucasus.