Fig. 134.—Third figure.
Mr. Silvanus P. Thompson, Professor of Physics at University College, Bristol, has recently presented the French Society of Physical Science with a curious example of optical illusion, the true cause of which is not clearly known, but which we may compare with other facts made known some time ago, of which no precise explanation has been given. Let us first consider in what the effect discovered by Mr. S. P. Thompson consists, according to the description that has been given of it by M. C. M. Gariel; the illustrations here given will also allow of our verifying the truth of the statements.
Fig. 135. and Fig. 136.
Mr. Thompson’s optical illusion. Give a circular movement to these figures, and the circles will appear to turn round.
The first illustration consists of a series of concentric circles of about the width of a millimetre, separated by white intervals of the same size (fig. 135). These dimensions are not absolute; they vary with the distance, and may even be a few inches in width if it is desired to show the phenomenon to a rather numerous auditory. If we hold the design in the hand, and give it a twirl by a little movement of the wrist, the circle appears to turn round its centre, and the rotation is in the same direction, and is equally swift; that is to say, the circle appears to accomplish a complete turn, whilst the cardboard really accomplishes one in the same direction. For the second effect we draw a dark circle, in the interior of which are placed a number of indentations at regular intervals (fig. 136). Operating in the same manner as described above, this notched wheel appears to turn round its centre, but this time in a different direction from the real movement. In this, however, as in the other design, the effect is more satisfactory if we do not look directly at it; the movements also are particularly striking in combinations such as that represented in fig. 137, in which the multiplicity of circles does not allow us to fix one specially. We may add that the same effects may be obtained with eccentric wheels, or even with other curves than circles. By means of a photograph on glass, Mr. Thompson has been able to reflect these designs on a screen where they were obtained on a large scale; a circular movement was communicated to the photographic plate, so that the design moved in a circular manner on the screen, and in this case also there existed the illusion that every circle seemed turning round its centre. And what is the explanation of these curious effects? Mr. Thompson does not believe (and we share his opinion) that the faculty possessed by the retina of preserving images during a certain time (persistence of impressions on the retina) can entirely explain these phenomena. Without desiring to formulate a decided theory, Mr. Thompson is of opinion that we may class these facts with others which have been known for some time, and that perhaps it is necessary to attribute to the eye some new faculty which may explain the whole at once.
Fig. 137.—Another figure of Mr. Thompson’s. The different circles appear to turn round if we give the design a rotating movement.
Brewster and Adams have described phenomena which are equally curious, the principal of which we will describe, adding also some analogous investigations due to Mr. Thompson. The result seems to be that there exists in the eye a badly-defined purpose of nature, which in a certain way compensates (Brewster) for the real phenomenon, because it has a contrary effect, which will continue for some time after the cessation of the phenomena, and which gives by itself a sensation contrary to that which the real movement would have produced. Thus, after having fixed our eyes for two or three minutes on a rushing waterfall, if we suddenly turn our glance on the adjacent rocks, the latter appear to move from top to bottom. It is not a question here of the effect of the relative movement to be observed on regarding simultaneously the falling water and the rocks; if one can succeed in abstracting oneself to such an extent that the water appears motionless, the rocks appear to take a contrary movement. In the phenomenon we describe there is no simultaneous comparison; the eyes are turned successively first on the water, and then on the rocks. In a rapid river, such as the Rhine above the fall at Schaffhausen, the stream is not equally swift in every part, and the current is noticeably more rapid in the middle of the river than near the banks. If we look fixedly at the centre of the stream, and then suddenly turn our eyes towards the banks, it will appear as though the river were flowing back towards its source. This kind of compensation does not only produce an apparent displacement, but also changes in size. When travelling at great speed in a railway train, the objects of the surrounding country as one flies by them gradually appear smaller and smaller. If, when this occurs, we suddenly remove our eyes to the interior of the railway carriage, and fix them on immovable objects, such as the sides of the compartment, or the faces of our travelling companions, the images on the retina will really preserve the same size, and yet the objects will appear larger. Such are some of the interesting facts among those discovered by Mr. Thompson; and though we do not intend to push the inquiry further, we think it may not be without interest to describe here another illusion of that organ whose properties are in every way so curious and remarkable.
