Rural Wealth and Welfare: Economic Principles Illustrated and Applied in Farm Life

by Geo. T. Fairchild

Utility as related to value.—While utility is a basis of all values, it is not the chief element in measuring the value of wealth. The things of highest utility, like air and water, have no value as long as trifling exertion will bring them. Even land is without appreciable value so long as any person can obtain it by settling upon it.

In general, we measure utility by the relation between the nature of any object and human nature as expressed in wants. A bushel of wheat has utility equal to the number of loaves of bread it will furnish to hungry humanity. In this respect every bushel may have the same utility as every other. This would be true if every bushel of wheat was wanted by hungry people able to exert themselves in securing it; but if five bushels of wheat are sufficient for each human being in a year's supply of bread, a distribution to all the world of more than five bushels to each would make some of the wheat useless. So if the world's product of wheat more than supplies the world's want, the extra amount will be without utility unless some means of storing against future want is devised. In that case the utility of the stored portion will be lessened by the extra exertion required to store it until the need comes. One may be glad to pay twenty-five cents for a good dinner, but an equally good dinner offered immediately afterwards will have no utility, unless he can save it for [pg 067] supper. If the dinners offered are so many as to imply that several will be useless, the value of each is likely to be affected by this estimate of lost utility in some. Dinners in that case are liable to be furnished for what they are worth for cold suppers.

If any article of commerce, like wheat, has its highest utility in one way of meeting wants, as in bread, that utility will have a strong influence upon value as long as the supply of wheat is not too great for this want. If the supply of wheat should be so great that only a small portion could be used for bread, other utilities would be sought. It would be used for feeding hens, and perhaps for cattle feed. If still the amount is too great to be consumed, it might be used for starch. In this case the least useful portion is likely to furnish the estimate of value for the whole. Both the raiser of wheat and the user will consider the lowest use as the probable basis for sale.

Before the opening of the Erie canal a farmer in northern Ohio drew a load of wheat twelve miles in hope of a market. The dealer said: “It isn't worth anything, since nobody has any use for it. If you had a load of sand, I could pay you for that, to fill the mud-hole in front of my store.” Since the utility of some wheat was nothing, the value of all wheat tended to nothing. On the other hand, if wheat is scarce in the community, it will be used only to meet the wants of the delicate or the fastidious, whose comfort and life may depend upon it. In that case its general value will be estimated by its higher utility, whatever other use it is put to. That is called a final utility, which, in [pg 068] any particular case, is the lowest use implied in consuming the supply. And this final utility is the only one influencing the estimate of value.

It is possible, therefore, that the total utility of anything, like a paper of tacks, for instance, may be greatly increased, since it has indefinitely more uses than when tacks were first made. Yet the supply of tacks is so enormous that to consume them we must use them for trifling purposes; and therefore their value is a trifle. When we have water to throw away, its value is nothing. When water is limited to culinary uses, its value is considerable. When water is sufficient only to slake extreme thirst, its value is beyond price. Even the prospect of a future supply diminishes the utility of any commodity, since time is an important element in satisfaction. Thus a store of potatoes in early spring, however well preserved, has its final utility lowered, and therefore its value lessened, by the prospect of new potatoes.

On the other hand, the present value of a field of grain or the young orchard is dependent upon its utility in meeting a future want. Everything which enhances prospective utility of any article enhances its value; and everything which diminishes the chance of such utility, like bad weather, insects or plant diseases, diminishes the present value. In this way risk diminishes the value of wealth subject to it and increases the value of wealth which has passed by it.

In general, the usefulness of anything is no criterion for measuring value, because other elements of value are more important. Henry C. Carey says, “Utility is [pg 069] the measure of man's power over nature; value is the measure of nature's power over man.” This may be a striking way of saying that great utility implies a discovery of uses, while great value often indicates only difficulty in securing what has great usefulness.

Exertion as related to value.—Since utility, however essential to value, is not its measure, we are led to consider whether the exertion required to obtain any article desired may not measure its worth. This is certainly a matter of prime consideration, and many have been led to suppose the cost of production, by which is meant all the exertion necessary to bring any commodity to its final consumer, to be the sole and absolute measure of value.

This supposition, if ever correct, is subject to great modifications. None know better than farmers that a bushel of wheat from one field may have cost twice as much as a bushel from another field, without any possible distinction in value. Every mechanic knows that what he has accomplished with great exertion may have been duplicated by some labor-saving device with half the exertion, the two values being essentially equal. Nothing is more common than to find articles in the market sold without regard to cost because they are superseded by more desirable articles. Indeed, the most ardent defender of cost as the sole basis of value is obliged to notice multitudes of exceptions to the rule. Yet it must be granted that only those articles involving effort in securing them have value at all, and in general the amount of effort actually put forth has some relation to our estimate of value.

In general, men do not exert themselves more than [pg 070] necessary to meet wants, and in any exchange with others estimate the value of what they have produced by the exertion expended. Yet, as products of the same kind exchange in the same market without regard to their individual cost, it is evident that some other principle must be discovered. Nevertheless, no farmer will continue indefinitely the raising of a crop which brings in the market less than a fair average return for his labor in raising it. In a series of years he expects his wheat to return a fair compensation for labor expended. In the same way every manufacturer expects a full return for all cost of all his efforts, and would not continue his work from year to year without such expectation. Moreover, when for any reason the market value of anything is much above its cost, somebody is ready to increase the supply of that particular article, and more will add their efforts in the same direction until its value approaches nearly the general cost of production as compared with the cost of other products selling in the same market.