that thilke same soverein good be god.'
'Certes,' quod I, 'I ne may nat denye ne withstonde the
resouns purposed; and I see wel that it folweth by strengthe
of the premisses.'
'Loke now,' quod she, 'yif this be proved yit more fermely
85
thus: that ther ne mowen nat ben two soverein goodes that
ben dyverse amonge hem-self. For certes, the goodes that
ben dyverse amonges hem-self, that oon nis nat that that other
is; [thanne ne [may] neither of hem ben parfit, so as either of