ne hath no medlinge of good in his solitarie wrecchednesse?'
'So semeth it,' quod I.
'And what seystow thanne,' quod she, 'of thilke wrecche that
lakketh alle goodes, so that no good nis medled in his wrecchednesse,
and yit, over al his wikkednesse for which he is a wrecche, that
80
ther be yit another yvel anexed and knit to him, shal nat men
demen him more unsely than thilke wrecche of whiche the unselinesse
is releved by the participacioun of som good?'
'Why sholde he nat?' quod I.