[24] An sich selbst subjektiv. As essentially appertinent to the individual soul.
[25] Sich entgegenheit dem Geist, i.e., raises itself as a medium opposed to—or, as we should say, subservient to.
[26] This is obviously a reference to the false theory of light advanced by Goethe and accepted by Hegel.
[27] Das ganze Mensch. The entire man with all his faculties.
[28] This is a reference, of course, to the Art Philosophy of Schelling.
[29] Zum vornehmen Wesen. Ironical, of course. It is part of the aristocratic pretensions of the connoisseur.
[30] He means that as an explanation they are obvious provided the facts are true, which he then points out in such cases is not so.
[31] I am not sure I follow the sense here. I presume the meaning is that, as notionally considered, we have to commence with an architecture to which other arts are already subservient. The process of elaboration has already been carried beyond mere architecture. And in this sense he calls sculpture an elaboration (Ausbildung) of architecture. But the addition of painting and music as such elaboration is, to say the least, an unnecessary obscurity. Such an elaboration of a primitive form of music is suggested lower down. But the conception appears to me rather confusing.
[32] That is the final phase, romantic architecture.
[33] Other than architecture.