The Tunicata are remarkable for the variety in appearance, structure, and life-history which they present. No group illustrates in a more instructive manner so large a number of important biological principles and phenomena. They show solitary and colonial forms, fixed and free, pelagic and abyssal. The development is in some cases larval and with metamorphosis, in others abbreviated and direct. Persistent traces of ancestral characters are seen in the embryonic and larval stages, while the adults present the most varied secondary adaptations to littoral, pelagic, and deep-sea, free-swimming and sessile modes of existence. In the details of their classification they demonstrate both stable and variable species, monophyletic and polyphyletic groups. They exhibit the phenomena of gemmation and of embryonic fission, of polymorphism, hibernation, alternation of generations, and change of function. They have long been known as a stock example of degeneration; but in fact they lend themselves admirably to the exposition of more than one "Chapter of Darwinism."
* * * * *
Note to P. [78].—Oligotrema, Bourne (Quart. J. Micr. Sci. xlvii. Pt. ii. 1903, p. 233), a Molgulid from the Loyalty Islands, has a reduced branchial sac and greatly developed pinnate, muscular branchial lobes, probably used in capturing food.
CHAPTER IV
CEPHALOCHORDATA
INTRODUCTION—GENERAL CHARACTERS—ANATOMY OF AMPHIOXUS—EMBRYOLOGY AND LIFE-HISTORY—CLASSIFICATION OF CEPHALOCHORDATA—SPECIES AND DISTRIBUTION
The Cephalochordata comprise only a small group of little fish-like forms, the Lancelets, usually known as "Amphioxus," and referable to about a dozen species arranged in several closely allied genera under the single family Branchiostomatidae. The best known form is Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas), the common Amphioxus or Lancelet, which has been found in British seas, and even as far north as the coast of Norway, but is much more common in warmer waters, such as the Mediterranean, and is also found in the Indian Ocean. It is abundant in the Bay of Naples, and lives and breeds in great numbers in a salt lagoon, the "Pantano," near Messina, and from these localities most of the specimens have been obtained for the numerous recent researches upon its structure and development.
Amphioxus was first discovered and described (1778) by Pallas, who regarded it as a Mollusc, and named it Limax lanceolatus. It was first correctly diagnosed as a low Vertebrate, and named Branchiostoma, by Costa, in 1834. The term Amphioxus, under which it has become so well known, was applied to it a couple of years later by Yarrell.
The anatomy was for the first time fully investigated by Johannes Müller in 1841, and this important memoir has been supplemented in regard to special systems and histological details by numerous papers by many leading zoologists, such as those by Huxley in 1874, Langerhans in 1876, Lankester in 1875 and in 1889, Retzius in 1890, and Boveri and Hatschek, both in 1892. Important papers on special points have also been written by Rolph, Rohde, Benham, Andrews, Goodrich, and others. The development was first elucidated by Kowalevsky in 1867, at about the same time when he studied the development of the Ascidians, and later again in 1877. Further papers on the development and metamorphosis we owe to Hatschek in 1881, Lankester and Willey in 1890 and 1891, Wilson in 1893, and quite recently to MacBride. Dr. Willey's book, Amphioxus and the Ancestry of the Vertebrata (1894), contains a summary of investigations on structure and development, an interesting discussion of the relations of Amphioxus to the other Chordata, and a full bibliography.
In addition to such original researches, Amphioxus is studied in more or less detail every year by countless senior and junior students in zoological laboratories and marine stations throughout the civilised world. The value of this primitive form as an object of biological education depends upon the fact that it shows the essential Vertebrate characters, and their mode of formation, in a very simple and instructive condition. Although no doubt somewhat modified, and possibly degenerate in some details of structure, in its general morphology it presents us with a persistent type probably not far removed from the ancestral line of early Chordata. There are no sufficient grounds for the view that Amphioxus is a very degenerate representative of fish-like Vertebrata.