2. They suppose that we have an idea of length without breadth[248], or that length without breadth does exist.
3. That unity is divisible ad infinitum.
To suppose a M. S. divisible is to say there are distinguishable ideas where there are no distinguishable ideas.
The M. S. is not near so inconceivable as the signum in magnitudine individuum.
Mem. To examine the math, about their point—what it is—something or nothing; and how it differs from the M. S.
All might be demonstrated by a new method of indivisibles, easier perhaps and juster than that of Cavalierius[249].
M.
Unperceivable perception a contradiction.
P. G.