[286] Littell, Stat. Laws of Ky. (1814), IV, 20. This restriction upon the defendant appears also in the act of 1812: ibid., IV, 407-10.
[287] Acts (1819-20), 896.
[288] Act of March 2, 1843: Acts (1842-43), 29, 30.
[289] Kentucky Stat. (1899), 827.
[290] Rev. Stat. of Ariz. (1887), 374; Comp. Laws of N. M. (1897), 407 ff.; Digest of Ark. (1894), 680 ff.; Ann. Stat. of Ind. Ter. (1899), 324-27; Laws of the Rep. of Tex. (act of Jan. 6, 1841), V, 20; also Rev. Civil Stat. of Tex. (1888), I, 887; Ann. Civil Stat. (1897), I, 1095-1100; Code of W. Va. (1899), 660 ff.; also Kelly, Rev. Stat. of W. Va. (1878), I, 495. The five-year limit for Missouri is fixed by the act of Jan. 24, 1835: Rev. Stat. (1835), 226; and is retained in Rev. Stat. (1845), 428; and ibid. (1879), I, 362; but it is struck out by Laws (1885), 159; and there is no restriction in Rev. Stat. (1899), I, 741-44. But by the act of Jan. 31, 1833, it was provided that "when one of the parties ... shall be divorced, it shall ... be lawful for the other party to marry again, after two years shall have expired."—Laws of a Pub. and Gen. Nature (1842), II, 361.
[291] Ann. Code of Miss. (1892), 420; Rev. Code (1857), 334.
[292] Cf. Acts (1824), 61, 62; ibid. (1869-70), 76, 77; ibid. (1872-73), 122; Code of Ala. (1897), 492, 493.
[293] Stat. of Okla. (1893), 876, 877; Wilson, Statutes (1903), II, 1122.
[294] Digest of Civil Laws (1808), 28; Rev. Civil Code (1888), 68.
[295] Rev. Laws (1897), 306; ibid. (1870), 21; Acts (1827), 132, 134; Acts (1855), 376, 377.