III. Plant Formations.
911. The term plant formation is applied to associations of plants of the same kind, though there is a great difference in the use of the word by different writers which leads to some confusion.[50] It is sometimes applied to an association of individuals of a species, or of several species occupying a rather definite area of ground where the soil conditions are not greatly different (individual formation); by others it is applied to the plants of a definite physiographic area, as a swamp, moor, strand, or beach, bank, rock hill, clay hill, ravine, bluff, etc. (principal formation); and in a broad sense it is applied to the plants of climatic regions, of those in bodies of water, etc. (general formations). Space here is too limited to discuss all these kinds of formations, but the nature of the general formations will be pointed out. The general formations may be grouped into four divisions:
- 1st. Climatic formations.
- 2d. Edaphic formations.
- 3d. Aquatic formations.
- 4th. Culture formations.
912. Climatic formations.—Climatic influences extend over wide regions, so that climate controls the general type of vegetation of a region. In the sense of control there are two climatic factors, temperature and moisture, especially soil moisture. Temperature exerts a controlling influence over the vegetation type only where the total heat during the period of growth and reproduction is very low. This occurs in polar lands and at high elevations where the climate is alpine. In the temperate and tropical regions of the globe moisture, not heat, controls the general vegetation type. These vegetation types in general are coincident with rainfall distribution, and Schimper recognizes here three types, which with the arctic-alpine type would make four climatic formations as follows:
1st. The woodland formation.—This formation is characterized by trees and shrubs, and it is what is called a close formation. By this it is meant that so far as the climate is concerned the conditions are favorable for the development of trees and shrubs in such abundance that they become the dominant vegetation type of the region and grow close together. Other plants, as herbs, grasses, etc., occur, but they grow as subordinate elements of the general vegetation type, and as undergrowth. The land portion of the globe, therefore, outside of arctic and alpine regions, where the annual precipitation is 40 to 60 or more inches, is the area for woodland formation. In some places, the eastern part of England, for example, the annual precipitation is 25 to 30 inches, but the cool temperature permits a forest growth. It is true there are places where forests do not grow,—where man cuts them down, for example. But if cultivated lands in this region were allowed to go to waste, they would in time grow up to forest again. So there are swamps where the soil is too wet for trees, or sandy or rocky areas where there is not a sufficient amount of soil or water to support forest trees. But here it is the soil conditions, not climatic conditions, which prevent the development of the forest. But we know that swamps are being filled in and the ground gradually becoming higher and drier, and that soil is slowly accumulating in rocky areas, so that in time if left to natural forces these places would become forested. So this area of heavy annual rainfall is a potential forest area. These areas are determined by warm currents of moisture-laden air from the ocean moving over cooler land areas where the moisture is precipitated. In general these areas are along the coasts of great continents and on mountains. Therefore the interior of a continent is apt to be dry because most of the moisture has been precipitated before it reaches the interior. Deserts or steppes are therefore usually near the interior of continents. Some exceptions to this general rule are found: central South America, which is a region of exceptional rainfall because the moisture-laden winds here come from the warmest part of the ocean; the desert region west of the Andes mountains, where the winds are not favorable; southern California, where the winds come chiefly from a cooler portion of the Pacific ocean and move over an area of high temperature, etc.
Fig. 486.
Typical prairie scene, a few miles west of Lincoln, Nebraska. (Bot. Dept., Univ. Nebraska.)
2d. Grassland formation.—Grasses form the dominant vegetation type where the annual rainfall is approximately 15 to 25 inches. In true grasslands the formation is a close one since there is still a sufficient amount of moisture to provide for all the plants which can stand on the ground. Yet there is not enough moisture to permit the growth of forest as the dominant type without aid and protection by man. The so-called prairie regions are examples. Trees and shrubs do occur, but they cannot compete successfully with the grasses because the climatic conditions are favorable for the latter and unfavorable for the former. On the border line between forest and prairie the line of division is not a clear-cut one because conditions grade from one to the other. The two formations are somewhat mixed, like the outposts of contending armies, arms of the forest or prairie extending out here and there. In the United States the prairies extend from Illinois to about the 100th meridian, and beyond this to the foothills of the Rockies and southwest to the Sonora Nevada desert the region is drier, the rainfall varying from 10 to 20 inches. This is the area of the Great Plains, and while grasses of the bunch type are dominant, they make a more or less open formation because the moisture is not sufficient to supply all the plants which could be crowded on the ground, each individual tuft needing an area of ground surrounding it on which it can draw for moisture. Such a formation is an open one, and in this respect is similar to desert formations.