Ἀπόφανσις, Enunciation, name for Proposition in De Interpretatione, [141].
[Appetite], the direct producing cause of movement in animals, [492].
Archytas, made Habere fifth Category, [80].
Arguments, how to find, for different theses, [157].
Arimnestus, brother of Aristotle, [19].
Aristippus, anticipated Epikurus, [654].
Aristomenes, friend of Aristotle, [17].
Aristophanes, of Byzantium, arranged dialogues of Plato, [34]; on the style of Epikurus, [658].
‘Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus,’ work by V. Rose, [32].
[Aristotle], birth and parentage, [1], [2]; opportunities for physiological study, [2]; an orphan in youth, became ward of Proxenus, [8]; discrepant accounts as to his early life, [3]; medical practice, [3]; under Plato at Athens, [4]; went to Atarneus, on Plato’s death, [4]; married Pythias, [5]; driven out to Mitylene, [5]; invited by Philip of Macedon to become tutor to Alexander, [5]; life in Macedon, [5]; re-founded Stageira, [6]; taught in the Nymphæum of Mieza, [6]; returned to Athens, and set up his school in the Lykeium, [7]; lecturing and writing, [7], [25]; correspondence, [7]; relation to Athenian polities, [8]; protected and patronized at Athens by Alexander and Antipater, [8]; in spite of estrangement between him and Alexander, regarded always as unfriendly to Athenian liberty, [9], [10]; his relation to Nikanor, bearer of Alexander’s rescript to the Greek cities, [11]; indicted for impiety in his doctrines and his commemoration of the eunuch Hermeias, [12], [13]; retired to Chalkis, [14]; died there, before he could return to Athens, [15]; wrote a defence against the charge of impiety, [15]; his judgment on Athens and Athenians, [16]; his person, habits, manners, &c., [16]; his second wife, son, and daughter, [17]; last testament, [17]-19; his character as therein exhibited, [19]; reproaches against, [20]; his opposition to Plato misrepresented by Platonists, [20], [21]; a student and teacher of rhetoric, [22]; attacked Isokrates, [24]; assailed by three sets of enemies, [26]; difficulty in determining the Canon of his works as compared with Plato’s, [27]; extant works ascribed to, [27]; ancient authorities for his works, [28]; catalogue and extent of his works, according to Diogenes, [29]; according to Anonymus, [29]; the catalogues compared with each other, and with list of his extant works, [29], [30]; ancient encomiums on his style, [30]; his principal works unknown to Cicero and others, [31], [40]; dialogues and other works of, lost to us, [31]; works in the catalogue are declared by V. Rose not to belong to, [32]; different opinion of E. Heitz, [32]; allowance to be made for diversity of style, subject, &c., in the works of, [33]; works in the catalogue to be held as really composed by, [34]; extant works of, whence derived, [35]; fate of his library and MSS. on his death, till brought to Rome and cared for by Andronikus, [35] seq.; through Andronikus, became known as we know him, [40]; not thus known to the Alexandrine librarians, [42]; so-called Exoteric works of, [44]; his own use of the phrase “exoteric discourses,� [46] seq.; had not two doctrines — the Exoteric and Esoteric, [52]; the order of his extant works uncertain, [54]; his merit in noting equivocation of terms, [57]; not free from fascination by particular numbers, [74]; first made logical analysis of Ens, [97]; first to treat Logic scientifically, [130]; what he did for theory of Proposition, [136], [139]; claimed the theory of Syllogism as his own work, [140], [153], [259], [420]; his expository manner, novel and peculiar, [141]; specialized the meaning of Syllogism, [143]; first to ask if a proposition could be converted, [144]; first used letters as symbols in exposition, [148]; proceeded upon, but modified, Platonic antithesis of Science and Opinion, [207], [264]; specially claimed to be original in his theory of Dialectic, [262], [418]; attended to current opinion, drew up list of proverbs, [272], [440]; started in his philosophy from the common habit of speech, [434], [440]; continued the work of Sokrates, [439], [441]; devised a First Philosophy conformable to the habits of common speech, starting from the definite individual or Hoc Aliquid, [445]; psychology of, must be compared with that of his predecessors, [446]; rejected all previous theories on Soul, [452]; advance made in the Ontology of, [561]; his view of pleasure, [660]; ethical purpose of, [662].