[Hipparchia], wife of Krates, i. [173].
[ Hipparchus], authenticity, i. [297 n.], [307], [309], [337 n.], ii. [82], [93];
and Minos analogous and inferior to other works, [82];
purpose, [84];
subject — definition of lover of gain, [71];
double meaning of gain, [82];
first definition, rejected, [71];
character and precept of Hipparchus the Peisistratid, eulogy of Sokrates, [73];
Gain is good — apparent contradiction, [ib.];
gain the valuable, the profitable, and therefore the good, [75];
some gain is good, some evil, [74];
objections, [ib.];
no tenable definition of gain found, [82], [83].
Hippias Major, authenticity, i. [306], [315], ii. [33 n.];
date, i. [307], 308-10, [313];
situation and interlocutors, ii. [33];
Hippias lectured at Sparta on the beautiful, the fine, the honourable, [35], [39];
no success at Sparta — law forbids, [35];
the lawful is the profitable, [36];
comparison with Xenophon, [34], [37];
the beautiful? [39];
instances, [40];
Gold makes all things beautiful, [41];
complaint of vulgar analogies, [42];
answer fails of universal application, [ib.];
the becoming, and the useful — objections, [43-4];
a variety of the pleasurable, [45];
inadmissible, [ib.];
Sokrates attempts to assign some general concept, [47], [193 n.], iii. [365];
analogy of Sokrates’ explanations in Memorabilia, ii. [49];
and Minor illustrate general theory of the dialogues of Search, [63];
antithetise rhetoric and dialectic, [70].
Hippias Minor, authenticity, i. [306], ii. [55 n.], [57 n.];
date, i. [306], [308-10], [310], [315];
and Major illustrate general theory of dialogues of Search, ii. [63];
antithetise rhetoric and dialectic, [70];
polemical and philosophical purpose, [63];
its thesis maintained by Sokrates in Memorabilia, [66];
combated by Aristotle, [67];
characters and situation, [55];
Achilleus preferred by Hippias to Odysseus, veracity to mendacity, [56], [58];
contested by Sokrates veracious and mendacious man the same, [57];
to hurt wilfully better than to do so unwillingly, [58];
Hippias dissents, [60];
good man alone does evil wilfully, Sokrates’ perplexity, [61];
critics on the sophistry of Sokrates, [62].
[Hippokrates], iv. [260].
[Hobbes] on similitude of passions in all, but dissimilarity of objects, i. [452 n.];
exercises for students, iii. [80 n.], [90 n.];
subject and object, [117 n.];
analogy of state to individual, iv. [96];
cause, i. [139 n.], [144];
Diodorus’ doctrine defended, [143];
coincides with Aristotle on motion, [146].
[Holiness], what is? i. [439];
not what gods love, [445], [448], [454];
why the gods love it, [446];
how far like justice, ii. [278];
not a branch of justice, i. [447];
not a right traffic between men and gods, [448];
is it holy? ii. [278];
the holy, one type in Platonic, various in Xenophontic, Sokrates, i. [454].
[Homer], cosmology, i. [2];
censured by Xenophanes, [16];
Herakleitus, [26];
considered more as an instructor than as a poet, ii. [126];
and poets, the great teachers, [135];
picture in Republic, as really knowing nothing [ ib.], iv. [92];
Strabo on, [152 n.];
Herakleitus the allegorist, iii. [3 n.], iv. [157 n.];
Plato’s fictions contrasted with, [153 n.];
diversity of subjects, ii. [132];
inspired by gods, [128];
analogy of Magnet, [ib.];
on friendship, [179];
identified by Plato with Homo Mensura, iii. [114].
[Homo Mensura], see [Relativity].