[92]. 4 Q. B. D., 685.
[93]. 10 Q. B. D., 100.
[94]. 5 E. & B., 238. Vid. sup., p. 11. et seq., as to the law relating to bills given for an illegal consideration.
[95]. 33 L. T. n.s., 561.
[96]. 4 Q. B. D., 685. The cases bearing on this point are more fully discussed in the next chapter on Stock Exchange Transactions.
[97]. Per Cotton, L. J., in Thacker v. Hardy, p. 695.
[98]. 2 Wils., 309.
[99]. See, too, Caminada v. Hulton, 60 L. J. M. C., 116.
[100]. Each promise to pay on one event, being the consideration, and the sole consideration for the promise to pay in the other event.
[101]. See Stutfield on “Tattersall’s Rules of Betting,” Field Office, where this view of the matter is fully elucidated.