[392]. 60 L.J.M.C. 116: The case has before been dealt with under Lotteries.
[393]. 34 J.P., 661.
[394]. 24 Q. B. D., 529; better reported 62 L. T. N. S., 436.
[395]. 13 M. & W., 838.
[396]. Hansard, Vol. 218, p. 595.
[397]. L. R., 12 Q. B. D., 128.
[398]. 20 Q. B. D., 182.
[399]. Reg. v. Newton, L.R., 1892, 1 Q. B., 648.
[400]. A question was raised in Turpin v. Jenks, as to what was to be done with the “persons found therein.” The answer seems to be that the power is given to enable the officers to ascertain by inquiry how far these persons were responsible for the gaming. See per Field, J., in Anderson v. Hume, 46, J.P. 825; besides, the Statute 17 & 18 Vict., c. 38, compels these persons to give their addresses. It would seem therefore that having given their addresses they should be released until the police are in a position to make a definite charge against them.
[401]. See, too, Anderson v. Hume, 46 J. P. 825.