[247] See Archaelogiai Ertesitö, 1905 and following, and for the inscriptions A. E. 1906 and following.
[248] D. lviii (138-46), iii. 3331.
[249] iii. 10316, 10318. A. E. 1906. 110. Ib. 1909. 150. Ib. 1910. 137.
[250] D. lviii. The name of the town is missing.
[251] A. E. 1910. 141. Cf. 133.
[252] D. xxvii, xxxvii; iii. 4371. Another inscription (iii. 4368) mentions a Batavian, but he is a decurion who may have been transferred on promotion from another corps.
[253] For orientals on the Rhine, cf. xiii. 7512, 7514.
[254] Throughout the Empire the archer regiments seem to have been exclusively Thracians or orientals, but the latter alone preserved their national character in the second century.
[255] iii. 10315, 10316.
[256] The difficulty is to establish clear cases of men who must have entered a regiment after its original formation. The ‘Britto’ of the Dacian diploma for 145-61 (lxx) seems to be one.